<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review and feedback - modified settlement option A
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review and feedback - modified settlement option A
- From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:10:14 +0200
Hi Marika,
yes the strikethrough made it through, but the clause is a bit ambiguous
due to the use of "to confirm". I think it could be improved by changing
that to "confirming". The first your be interpreted as a notice that we
should confirm whereas the latter is clear that the notice is the
confirmation.
Best,
Volker
Hi Volker,
I believe that is what (4) says: 'provider issues notice to registrar
to confirm the details of the settlement'. Maybe the strikethrough /
bolded language did not make this clear?
Marika
From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday 21 June 2013 10:17
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>"
<Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review and feedback - modified
settlement option A
Hi Marika,
no, as this change to (4) would change the entire purpose of this
clause and make our argument ad absurdum. As registrars, we cannot be
in the position to "confirm the details of the settlement" as this
could entail legal review that we cannot provide. It should really be
the provider confirming the details of the settlement to the registrar.
Best,
Volker
Dear All (and especially Kristine and David R-T),
As discussed during yesterday's meeting concerning the options for
settlement, it appears that the majority of WG members is either
strongly or moderately in favour of option A, with only the UDRP
Providers participating in this WG strongly in favour of option B. In
order to address the concerns raised by the UDRP Providers, those on
the call yesterday would like to explore whether the following,
slightly modified version of option A, including implementation
guidance, would make it acceptable to the UDRP Providers, noting that
additional edits could definitely be explored (please note that I
also identified an additional question when revising the current
language):
*Option A*: (1) parties ask for suspension, (2) parties settle, (3)
parties inform provider, (4) provider issues order notice to
registrar to *confirm the details of the settlement *change the
holder details or delete the domain name, (5) that *settlement is
carried out by the registrar *change or deletion happens, (6)
complainant confirms change or deletion is complete
[/question -- should it be the complainant or the registrar that
confirms that the settlement has been carried out?/] , and (7)
provider dismisses the case.
*Implementation guidance*: The provider notice confirming the
settlement could be a standardised form issued by the UDRP Provider
to the complainant and respondent at the time a suspension is
requested to discuss settlement. Such form would have to be executed
by both parties (or their representatives) and would confirm that the
parties have settled and request that the domain name(s) subject to
the proceedings a) remain with the respondent, b) be transferred to
the complainant (details of the latter for each contact set would
have to be specified, or c) be deleted.
Please share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list.
With best regards,
Marika
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web:www.key-systems.net /www.RRPproxy.netwww.domaindiscount24.com
/www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystemswww.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht
nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder
telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web:www.key-systems.net /www.RRPproxy.netwww.domaindiscount24.com
/www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystemswww.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht
nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder
telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|