RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April Meeting

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd be happy to suggest and will revert. I'm sure others will also have 
thoughts. 

 

Best, 

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication. 

 

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 01 May 2009 15:08
To: Victoria McEvedy; Olga Cavalli
Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April Meeting

 

Dear Victoria,

 

Thank you for your helpful comments and additional information.  As you have 
noted, perhaps looking at criteria beyond those identified in our Work Plan 
will help to make this document more useful to the team.  I welcome specific 
suggestions of additional criteria to include.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
        Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:07 AM
        To: Olga Cavalli; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
        Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April 
Meeting

        Julie thank you. I think we ought to have given you some more guidance 
as I'm afraid the exercise is too limited at present to be of real use. It may 
be that the team needs to identify other criteria for inclusion.  

         

        I note that the IPC has classes of membership and not all can vote. In 
fact -only international organizations can have a vote. 

         

        I filed a Minority Report detailing issues with "participation" in the 
IPC. You will see why membership eligibility and admission templates do not 
encompass these sorts of issues -nor does our chart in so far as it is 
similarly limited. 

         

        Best, 

         

        Victoria McEvedy

        Principal 

        McEvedys

        Solicitors and Attorneys 

        

         

        96 Westbourne Park Road 

        London 

        W2 5PL

         

        T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

        F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

        M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

         

        www.mcevedy.eu  

        Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

        This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the 
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be 
legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by 
reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, 
copying or forwarding the contents.

        This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no 
retainer is created by this email communication. 

         

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
        Sent: 01 May 2009 00:24
        To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
        Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April 
Meeting

         

        Dear Julie,
        Thanks a lot for the document, I think it is very good in order to 
starting a revision of the existing constituencie´s available information.
        As we wait for the analysis of the proposed stakeholder group charters, 
I would encourage each constituecy representative in our working team to review 
the document and make suggestions of changes and/or additions.
        Regards to all,
        Olga

        2009/4/30 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

        Dear Work Team Members,

         

        Attached for your review and consideration is a draft preliminary 
analysis of existing constituencies against the criteria in subtasks 1, 2, and 
3 in response to Action Item 1 from the 24 April 2009 meeting.  This document 
also is linked to the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.  In this 
preliminary analysis there appeared to be many instances where information did 
not seem to be listed in constituency charters or web sites. These instances 
are indicated in the attached document with an "X" or "? NEED INPUT."  In these 
cases perhaps those Work Team members who represent constituencies may be able 
to provide suggestions for locating the information if it is available.

         

        Soon to follow is an analysis of the proposed stakeholder group 
charters.  This task likely will require less research as there are no sources 
other than the charters (such as web sites) to analyze.

         

        Thank you very much for your assistance.  Your comments and suggestions 
for improving this document are greatly appreciated.

         

        Best regards,

         

        Julie

         

        Julie Hedlund

        Policy Consultant