ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-osc-csg] FW: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII

  • To: <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] FW: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:11:30 -0400

Here's a possible issue that the Constitunency/Stakeholder Group WT
needs to consider as part of its tasks.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck 
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:10 AM
To: 'Alan Greenberg'; Council GNSO
Cc: 'Ray Fassett'; 'Olga Cavalli'
Subject: RE: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII

Good point Alan.  This sounds to be like an issue that may need to be
considered by the GNSO Operations and/or the GNSO
Constituency/Stakeholder Group WTs under the OSC, so I cc'd the chairs
of those teams. 

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:23 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
> 
> 
> We are working on the proposed Bylaw revisions for Articles X and XX, 
> and have been promised revisions related to Annex A, but unless I 
> missed it, we have had no discussion at all about Article VII, 
> regarding how Nominating Committee delegates are selected. Since the 
> seven GNSO delegates are tied to the current Constituencies (2 for the

> BC and 1 for each other Constituency), this would surely have to 
> change in the new model. At first glance, this is potentially a 
> controversial issue.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy