[gnso-osc-csg] RE: Document/Information Request

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert -thank you very much for this -it was extremely helpful. 

 

It would be useful for you to talk to us on the next call about
Stakeholder Group election of GNSO Council members and how the amendment
to the ICANN Bylaws at Art. XX (4) will impact any recommendations this
WG might make on a set of common or minimum participation rules and
operating procedures for GNSO constituencies. 

 

If there is any existing work product or other material pertaining to
that issue not included in the materials you provided -that would be
useful also. 

 

Thanks again for your assistance which is greatly appreciated. 

 

Best,  

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: Robert Hoggarth [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 05 July 2009 17:36
To: Julie Hedlund; Victoria McEvedy; Olga Cavalli
Subject: Re: Document/Information Request

 

Dear Julie, Victoria and Olga:

I have attached a series of emails from Denise Michel to the GNSO
community on a number of GNSO Council restructuring items that were sent
around the time frame of the Constituency NOIF and Petition template
development. 

I think the document to which the web page specifically refers is the
first email on the list dated October 15.  I am attaching the others for
further context as they touch on a number of related issues - as you
know all these restructuring matters are interrelated in some respect.
The  messages are archived in the GNSO  Mailing list archive - 
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/.

Although they are pretty straightforward, happy to discuss the thinking
behind the templates at Friday's meeting.

Best,

Rob Hoggarth


On 7/3/09 12:02 PM, "Julie Hedlund" <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Victoria,

I will consult with Rob Hoggarth as I am unclear as to which document
this text refers.

Thank you.

Julie


-----Original Message-----
From: Victoria McEvedy  [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:28  AM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: Olga Cavalli
Subject:  Document/Information Request


 

Hi Julie -I wonder if  I could trouble you for some information: 



At http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm#foot3



It says:  



ICANN Staff circulated  to the GNSO community a proposal intended to
provide initial guidance and  structure for prospective new
constituencies.



While the two template documents are posted -nothing else  is. I would
be grateful for the paper/proposal that is referred to and that  perhaps
gave the thinking behind the templates.



Thanks Julie. 





Victoria  McEvedy

Principal  

McEvedys

Solicitors and  Attorneys 





96 Westbourne Park  Road 

London  

W2  5PL



T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44  (0) 7990 625 169 



www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by  the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This  email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use  of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally  privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply  immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying  or forwarding the contents.

This  email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is  created by this email communication.