RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

[Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>]

Victoria,

The draft document you wrote, states under "Staff Review":

"The Staff reviewed each Constituency Charter and Recertification application 
and made comments and suggestions to each Constituency. We also considered the 
Staff comments [and responses from Constituencies] [create master schedule and 
refer]."

I do not recall ever seeing the staff comments on the Registry or Registrar 
constituency recertification documents. The last email I have from Rob on this 
(attached) has the staff comments on the non-contracting party recertification 
documents.

Do you have a copy of the staff comments on contracting-party recertification 
documents?

Rob, if you have not sent these over to our list yet, can you please do so?

Thanks

Claudio

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:59 AM
To: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Olga Cavalli'; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG 
Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Gisella Gruber-White'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'Robert 
Hoggarth'
Subject: [Junk released by Allow List] RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

Victoria please find my comments.  In general this represents a great deal of 
effort and I'd like to recognize that.

Thank you for the contribution.

Best Regards,

Michael Young

Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220

From: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: August-31-09 6:05 AM
To: Olga Cavalli; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert Hoggarth
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

Olga - I was proposing to write up and summarise comments on subtask 1.2 
--rather than include them verbatim. Both your comments and those of other 
subtask members and any others. I'd like to reserve the final decision on that 
until the final comments come in tomorrow. I think we also need to consider our 
timeframes again following Robert's point ---and work in time for us to try to 
reach a consensus ---as its this group that must try to do so ---not our 
steering committee. Victoria

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

________________________________
From: Olga Cavalli
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:29:11 -0300
To: OSC-CSG Work Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
Hi,
some comments:

1. I have finished reviewing the document prepared by VIctoria, which is very 
complete and includes several recommendations.

Claudio has already comment, also mysefl. The document with our comments is 
attached to this email, please remember we have a due date for this revision 
which is next Tuesday 1st September.

2. SS will send his documents in parts, Krista will send her documents soon.

3. Julie will include Claudio´s recommendations in her document.

We will try to have all draft document of subtasks by Friday 4 september and 
organize our work during our conference call that day.

Please let me know if any of you need help.

Regards to all and have a good week.

Olga

2009/8/28 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Dear Work Team members,

First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.

We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in order 
to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the end of 
next week.

In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference call today:

1. WT should look and comment SS document.
SS will add background and additional information and will circulate new 
version of the document.

2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for next 
Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of the 
wt also can comment.

3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations document, 
Victoria will join them in doing this task.
WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.

4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to your 
draft document about subtask 4?

5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my suggestion is to 
use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs: references, 
introduction, background, recommendations and add a general conclusion. I 
volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the different parts 
ready.

6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document to the 
OSC.
Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that the 
document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next 
conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24.

Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.

Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and hard 
work.

Best
Olga


--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar<http://www.south-ssig.com.ar>



--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar<http://www.south-ssig.com.ar>

--- Begin Message ---

• To: OSC-CSG Work Team <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Additional Constituency Analysis Docs
• From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:16:02 -0400

Dear CSG Work Team Members:

Per our previous correspondence, attached please find three sets of additional 
raw constituency charter analysis materials prepared by the staff regarding the 
ISP, NCUC and Business Constituencies. More to come!

Rob Hoggarth

Attachment: Staff Analysis-BC Renewal Rpt and Charter (FINAL).doc
Description: Staff Analysis-BC Renewal Rpt and Charter (FINAL).doc

Attachment: Staff Analysis-ISPC Renewal Rpt and Charter (FINAL).doc
Description: Staff Analysis-ISPC Renewal Rpt and Charter (FINAL).doc

Attachment: Staff Analysis-NCUC Renewal Rpt and Charter (FINAL).doc
Description: Staff Analysis-NCUC Renewal Rpt and Charter (FINAL).doc

--- End Message ---