RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

[Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>]

All,

I have been out of office so have not had a chance to review this extensively, 
but at first glance it appears most, if not all, of my concerns remain.

On style, I find the tone still quite negative. In particular, I do not support 
admonishing constituencies or SGs in this report, even on a generalized level. 
That specific SGs have been singled-out on issues I think is incendiary and 
unnecessary. More importantly, I do not believe the assertions are supported by 
the facts in these areas.

In sum, i read these recommendations to require all GNSO groups on almost every 
important element regarding how a group might function, organize, and represent 
its stakeholders - to all do so in the same manner & under the same procedures 
and format. To me, that is the antithesis of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder 
model.

Certainly there are topics and rules where commonality across the groups is 
beneficial, and we received specific recommendations to implement from the BGC. 
But I think these areas of commonality are limited in scope, and while we 
strive to develop further recommendations, we should keep in mind the diversity 
of the GNSO while doing so. Forcing diverse groups serving different interests 
to all follow the same rules and procedures on virtually all matters would 
cause much more harm than good in my view.

Can share more particulars tomorrow.

Claudio

________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
victoria@xxxxxxxxxx [victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:27 PM
To: Anthony Harris; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Olga Cavalli; Julie Hedlund
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

Tony ---I have been a member of two constituencies so I am speaking from 
experience. Further the BGC, the LES and the other reviewers all expressed the 
view that there was a lack of basic transparency. Let's try to keep the tone 
impersonal and professional. I think it will be more constructive. Regards, 
Victoria

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

________________________________
From: "Anthony Harris"
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:38:19 +0100
To: Victoria McEvedy<victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>; OSC-CSG Work 
Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

I attach some comments to this "final report".

I will try and be on at least the first 30 minutes of
tomorrow's call. Just in case, my comments are
on record in the attached document (in blue text).
I continue to be uncomfortable with the tone of
this report, which still conveys a categorization
of the Constituencies as being some sort of
secret societies, that speak in whispers and
conspire in the dark. I would have preferred a
more objective approach, that takes into account
the efforts that constituencies have been making
over the last 11 years, for very little thanks as it
would appear.

Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: Victoria McEvedy<mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: OSC-CSG Work Team<mailto:gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Olga Cavalli<mailto:olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ; Julie 
Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

Please find attached the final report for Subtask 1.2.

Regards,


Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:A2DBF1370BDE43688C530F77BFEA9105@harrys]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu<http://www.mcevedy.eu>
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of SS Kshatriy
Sent: 09 September 2009 23:38
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Olga Cavalli
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

Hi Everybody,
I have attached Draft 2 Subtask 1. this is improvement on Draft 1 earlier 
circulated and and suitably incorporates inputs from Chuck and Victoria..

best regards,

SS




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4411 (20090909)__________


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4412 (20090909)__________


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4414 (20090910)__________


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4414 (20090910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4415 (20090910)__________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com