ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

  • To: <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS
  • From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:19:48 -0300

Victoria,

My comments are directed to the substance of the
draft, not to any person. As far as I know, expressing
an opinion does not cancel out professionalism?

Regards

Tony
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx 
  To: Anthony Harris ; OSC-CSG Work Team 
  Cc: Olga Cavalli ; Julie Hedlund 
  Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 6:27 PM
  Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS


  Tony ---I have been a member of two constituencies so I am speaking from 
experience. Further the BGC, the LES and the other reviewers all expressed the 
view that there was a lack of basic transparency. Let's try to keep the tone 
impersonal and professional. I think it will be more constructive. Regards, 
Victoria
  Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: "Anthony Harris" 
  Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:38:19 +0100
  To: Victoria McEvedy<victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>; OSC-CSG Work 
Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS


  I attach some comments to this "final report".

  I will try and be on at least the first 30 minutes of
  tomorrow's call. Just in case, my comments are
  on record in the attached document (in blue text).
  I continue to be uncomfortable with the tone of
  this report, which still conveys a categorization
  of the Constituencies as being some sort of
  secret societies, that speak in whispers and
  conspire in the dark. I would have preferred a
  more objective approach, that takes into account
  the efforts that constituencies have been making
  over the last 11 years, for very little thanks as it
  would appear.

  Tony Harris
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Victoria McEvedy 
    To: OSC-CSG Work Team 
    Cc: Olga Cavalli ; Julie Hedlund 
    Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 12:14 PM
    Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS


    Please find attached the final report for Subtask 1.2. 

     

    Regards, 

     

     

    Victoria McEvedy

    Principal 

    McEvedys

    Solicitors and Attorneys 



     

    96 Westbourne Park Road 

    London 

    W2 5PL

     

    T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

    F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

    M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

     

    www.mcevedy.eu  

    Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

    This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the 
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be 
legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by 
reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, 
copying or forwarding the contents.

    This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer 
is created by this email communication. 

     

    From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of SS Kshatriy
    Sent: 09 September 2009 23:38
    To: OSC-CSG Work Team
    Cc: Olga Cavalli
    Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

     

          Hi Everybody,

          I have attached Draft 2 Subtask 1. this is improvement on Draft 1 
earlier circulated and and suitably incorporates inputs from Chuck and 
Victoria..

           

          best regards,

           

          SS
         

     

     

    __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 4411 (20090909)__________

     

    The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

     

    http://www.eset.com

     

    __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 4412 (20090909)__________

     

    The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

     

    http://www.eset.com

     

    __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 4414 (20090910)__________

     

    The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

     

    http://www.eset.com



    __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 4414 (20090910) __________

    The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

    http://www.eset.com



  __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4415 (20090910)__________

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  http://www.eset.com

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy