ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations

  • To: Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:30:32 -0700

Victoria,

I don't believe it was the team's intention to call for a vote.  I believe it 
was simply to allow members who were not on the call to comment/add to the 
discussion.  However, as I noted, I could be mistaken.  I believe Olga is 
traveling at the moment, but I'm sure that she will be happy to give her 
thoughts and help provide further clarification.

Thanks so much,

Julie


On 9/25/09 1:17 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well that would be a vote -is it being voted on?

In that case I suggest we arrange a proper vote for our next call.

Best,



Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3336730232_81378]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 September 2009 18:16
To: Victoria McEvedy; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations

Victoria,

Thanks so much.  With respect to number 3 I had thought we were seeking 
comments from those who were not on the call, but I may be incorrect in my 
assumption.

Best regards,

Julie


On 9/25/09 1:10 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Julie I will be reverting with comments on Monday.

We already dealt with (3) on the call and failed to reach a rough consensus as 
I understood it?

Best,



Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3336730232_98291]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 25 September 2009 16:36
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations

Dear Work Team members,

On today's call we discussed the final draft of the Tool Kit Services 
Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11 Sept 09), which incorporates 
changes suggested by Claudio.  On the call we decided to circulate this final 
draft to allow time for those who have not already done so to comment on the 
document.  The Work Team is asking for a response from you, no later than 
Tuesday, 29 September, on the following:

 1.  Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the Tool Kit Services Recommendations
 2.  If no suggested changes, please affirm that you agree with the final draft 
version of the Recommendations
 3.  Please indicate whether these Recommendations should be provided  a) to 
the OSC as soon as they are agreed to by the Work Team; b) along with 
Recommendations for the other Subtasks; or c) please let us know if you have 
suggestions for another way to handle these Recommendations.

Also, those of you who were at the meeting please feel free to add comments or 
clarifications to my summary of this action item from our meeting. Please let 
me know if you have any questions.

Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Julie

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4457 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

JPEG image

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy