ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 30 April 2010 Meeting

  • To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 30 April 2010 Meeting
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:29:51 -0700

Dear Work Team members,

Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting.  Please let me know if you 
have any changes or questions.  Our next meeting will be held next Friday, 07 
May at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for one hour.  Scott Pinzon, Director, Policy 
Communications/Information Services, will join us at half past the hour during 
the discussion on outreach to provide information and answer questions about 
current and planned efforts for communications relating to outreach.  The 
actions and summary are included on the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.

Best regards,

Julie

Discussion/Action Items:

Task 1: Work Team members agreed with the minor textual changes made by Julie 
Hedlund to clarify the organization of the recommendations. They also asked 
Julie to insert a reference to the BGC WG Report to clarify the origin of the 
specific recommendations to address any question concerning the difference 
between the use of "principles" versus "operating procedures" in the text. In 
addition, the Work Team members agreed to change the word "shall" to "should" 
throughout the recommendations, but to insert a definition prior to the 
recommendations section that "should" means "mandatory" unless otherwise 
specified. Finally, the Work Team members decided to delete Appendix A 
"Detailed Analysis of Group Operating Principles" since many of the 
recommendations in this section are inconsistent with those agreed to in the 
recommendations contained in the main body of the document. The Work Team noted 
that in the absence of a lengthy discussion of the recommendations in the 
"Detailed Analysis" section to make them consistent with the recommendations in 
the body of the document the section should be deleted. However, the Work Team 
noted that Work Team members could include any of these details, if desired, in 
a Minority Report that would be attached as an Appendix to the document. During 
the meeting Claudio noted that there were remaining comments from Chuck and 
Rafik that had not been discussed. Julie said they had all been discussed, but 
noticed after the call that she was in error. There are a couple of comments 
from Chuck in Section 2.3 that need to be discussed as follows: 1) 2.3.2 
Storing and Updating Membership Records, paragraph c -- need a definition of an 
"inactive member"; and 2) 2.3.2 paragraph d -- What is the meaning of the 
sentence, "The Operator should perform the updates to those holding an 
executive position in an ICANN Community."
ACTIONS: Julie will make the requested changes as redlines -- DONE: See 
attached file; and 2) Work Team members are requested to review the revised 
document and provide comments and/or minority reports no later than 14 May.

Task 2: The Work Team began a discussion of comments received from Olga, Chuck, 
and Rafik on the framework document. Michael asked whether the BGC WG Report 
provided details concerning outreach and Julie agreed to review the document. 
She also suggested that Chuck and the OSC could provide guidance. Michael added 
that it would be useful, for example, for the Work Team to recommend the 
development of a guide to ICANN for those unfamiliar with the organization. 
Julie noted that the Policy Update document as revised by Scott Pinzon had been 
designed to be understood by someone not familiar with ICANN and GNSO Policy 
and she suggested that it could be helpful for Scott to join for a Work Team 
call to discuss current and planned activities that could assist with outreach 
efforts.
ACTIONS: 1) Julie will invite Scott to the call on 7 May (DONE -- he has agreed 
to join at half past the hour); 2) Michael will send an email to the list with 
his ideas on specific outreach tools; 3) Julie will review the BGC WG Report 
for guidance on outreach activities; and 4) Work Team members are requested to 
provide any additional comments on the framework document (attached).

Attachment: OSC Constituency Stakeholder Group Work Team Task 1 Recommendations Rev 30 April 2010.doc
Description: OSC Constituency Stakeholder Group Work Team Task 1 Recommendations Rev 30 April 2010.doc

Attachment: OSC CSG Task 2 general notes + oc (2) with Gomes comments (1) + Rafik.doc
Description: OSC CSG Task 2 general notes + oc (2) with Gomes comments (1) + Rafik.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy