RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Minority Report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You misunderstand Victoria.  I am not suggesting that the minority
report should not be referenced as submitted or that any changes should
be made to your report.  I am suggesting an additional document be
prepared that would make it very easy for the WT, the OSC and the
Council to compare your recommendations to those in the WT  report in a
concise and accurate manner.  For me this would make it much easier for
me to simply see where the actual variations between the two
recommendations are and whether they are justifiable in my view or need
additional consideration.  In my opinion, your document does not do that
for several reasons: 1) it is very long and hence many who are not close
to this issue will not read it thoroughly; 2) it does not concisely list
your recommendations but instead incorporates them in the midst of lots
of background and your justification; 3) it does not accurately list all
of the WT final recommendations or discuss other related GNSO
requirements.

 

Chuck

 

From: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 8:09 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Olga Cavalli
Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Minority Report

 

I would like to say and I think SS would agree that we would prefer this
task not be undertaken and ask that the minority report be submitted
just as it is to be read in full---and not extracted from or condensed
or edited or trunciated in anyway whatsoever. Thank you. Victoria

Sent from my BlackBerry(r) wireless device

________________________________

From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 07:46:22 -0400

To: Victoria McEvedy<victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>; Olga
Cavalli<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>

Cc: Julie Hedlund<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>;
gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Minority Report

 

Olga,

 

After having read the minority report, I would like to make a suggestion
that I think would be beneficial to the CSG WT as we finalize our work,
to the OSC when they review our final report, and to the Council when
they take action on the recommendations that are sent forward by the
OSC.  I suggest that Julie (if possible) prepare a complete and concise
table that lists the recommendations in the minority report with the
corresponding recommendation from the WT report as applicable.  To the
extent possible:

*         Recommendations should be quoted verbatim from the applicable
document if that can be done briefly.

*         In cases where recommendations include multiple parts, they
should be broken out in those separate parts if that makes it easier to
compare the elements.

*         Document references should be included for all recommendations
from both documents to make it easy for anyone to go to the documents
and read the full text (e.g., Section #, Page #, Line # as appropriate).

*         The comparison table should not include any rationale for
recommendations but readers should be encourage to read the full text;
this will hopefully allow readers to compare the recommendations on
their face value and make their own analysis and form their own
questions.

I fully understand that this is a time consuming task for Julie, but I
strongly believe that it will save lots of time for everyone involved as
the recommendations move forward through the next steps of the process.

 

I welcome other thoughts on this.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:48 AM
To: Olga Cavalli
Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Minority Report

 

Dear Chair and WG, 

 

Please find attached by way of submission a Joint Minority Report by SS
Kshatriy and me.  

 

Julie, I wonder if you could help us with some of the missing links. 

 

Thank you and best regards, 

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 11 May 2010 23:56
To: Claudio Di Gangi
Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 07 May 2010 Meeting

 

Claudio,
thanks for your comments and suggestions.
I agree with them.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/10 Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>

Olga,

 

Thank you. Please see the attached red-line, where I made three edits.  

 

One covers a change we agreed to on a work team call: to delete the Term
limit for GNSO Councilors within this document. 

 

The reason is because term limits for Councilors are already specified
in the ICANN Bylaws, so we wanted to avoid confusion with those
provisions. For reference, I think Michael was chairing that particular
work team call. 

 

My other two edits are summarized below, and are non-substantive.

 

1.      I added "for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies" to the
title of the document so it is more clear as to where this applies.

 

2.      I made an edit to clarify a sentence in the background section
that I found vague because it referred to Groups existing within the
"GNSO Council", not the broader GNSO. This sentence now reads:

 

"When the BGC WG made its initial recommendations, the concept of
Stakeholder Groups (SGs) as part of the GNSO structure had not yet been
implemented.  Since then SGs have been implemented within the GNSO
structure along with Constituencies."

 

Subject to the correction identified above, I am OK approving this
document. Thanks to all for their time & hard work on the effort.

 

claudio

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 2:25 PM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 07 May 2010 Meeting

 

Thanks Julie for this.


Please note:

Work Team members are requested to review Task 1 document and to provide
any final comments and minority reports, if any, by Friday, 14 May.

In the case that you agree with the Task 1 text as it is now and do not
want to send minority reports or suggest changes, please send an email
to the list with this confirmation.

Have a nice weekend 

Regards
Olga

2010/5/7 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear Work Team members,

Here are the actions from today's meeting.  (You will find the summary
on the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.)
Please let me know if you have any changes or questions.  Our next
meeting will be held next Friday, 14 May at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST
for one hour. 

Best regards,

Julie

Action Items:
Task 1: Actions: 
1.  Olga asked Julie to make the changes and to circulate the revised
document. (Done, See attached document.) 
2.  Work Team members are requested to review the document and to
provide any final comments and minority reports, if any, by Friday, 14
May.

Task 2: 
Debbie will revise the framework document based on comments received
from Work Team members and circulate the revised document for review.

Summary: 
See the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team 

 

 

 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5106 (20100511)__________

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com

 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5114 (20100514)__________

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5114 (20100514)__________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com