Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Victoria,

Thank you very much for that helpful edit.  I replaced my previous version with 
your revised version.

Best regards,

Julie


On 5/26/10 3:35 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Julie and WT.

Thank you. I made one small redline edit ---just a reference to Appendix A on 
page 9.

Thanks and best,



Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3357733229_932407]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 26 May 2010 20:27
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

Dear Olga and Work Team members,

Attached is the revised document for review.  I have deleted the reference to 
the figure on page 9 as Krista requested and I have made the edits that 
Victoria has requested.  Please let me know if I have correctly captured the 
requested revisions or if there are further changes.  The changes are marked in 
redline for ease of identification.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Julie


On 5/25/10 5:47 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Krista and Victoria for the good reviews and suggestions about the Task 
1 document. I agree with them.
Other comments are also welcome.
Julie please include these suggested changes into a new version of the document 
and send it to our list.
If the Working Team is ok with this version we will send it to Phillip Shepard 
next Friday after our conference call.
I will take silence as an ok for sending the document, unless there are other 
changes suggested before Friday.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/24 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear Victoria,

Thank you for these suggestions.  These seem to be helpful and logical changes.

Best regards,

Julie



On 5/20/10 1:08 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx 
<http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Dear Julie and WT,

As the Minority Recommendation relates to items 2.1 and 2.2 –it should follow 
the Majority Recommendations on those topics---and not sit behind Databases 
which are unrelated.

I would suggest it might go at 2.2.10 n page 8.

I would also suggest the introduction to the Majority Recommendations on page 
3-4 should make clear that they are Majority Recommendations and indicate the 
level of support and that there follows a Minority Recommendation and the page 
on which it can be found.

Thanks and best,




Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3357733229_950505]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu>
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>  
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 20 May 2010 17:48
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

Dear Olga and Work Team Members,

Here is the revised document that includes the new title agreed to at the last 
meeting and the changes proposed by Claudio prior to the last meeting.  In 
addition, it includes the minority recommendation and the minority report.  
This also is posted to our wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.  Note 
that I made a minor formatting change to the minority report when I integrated 
it into the document: I changed the font to Times New Roman for the sake of 
consistency.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Julie


On 5/18/10 2:30 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx 
<http://olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Victoria,
thanks for the clarification and my apologies for the misunderstanding.
Julie please include the Minority Recommendation into the final Task 1 document 
and send the complete version to the list for final revision.
Best regards
Olga

2010/5/18 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx <http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> >
There seems to be some misunderstanding Olga.

Only one Minority Recommendation is made by SS and me –the below:

1.      We recommend the GNSO adopt a simple standard pre-fabricated 
Constituency structure and procedure(s) based on one member one vote and 
applicable to all Constituencies--with a menu/pull down list of accepted 
variations (to be kept to an absolute minimum). We recommend a simple standard 
meeting and committee procedure applying to all Constituencies. We recommend a 
standard handbook on Constituency practice and procedure. We recommend that 
this be translated into the 5 UN languages.



The balance is commentary and analysis ----and is not for extraction.  It after 
all entirely up to the Minority to identify their recommendations.  I repeat 
–no other Minority Recommendation is made. I hope this now clarifies the issue. 
 Please advise.  Please also be aware that the Minority Report is the authors’ 
intellectual property and moral rights are asserted.

Thank you.

Regards,


Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3357733229_979833]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu>  <http://www.mcevedy.eu>
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>  
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 18 May 2010 19:03
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1


Dear Work Team members,

We are now close to finishing our Task 1 document.

The document will include also the revised Minority Report from Victoria and SS.

In addition to this general document with all its parts and minority report, I 
am asking Julie to prepare a comparison table of the recommendations in the 
Minority Report and in the WT report.  This will not replace the Minority 
Report, which will be submitted in its entirety along with the WT report.  The 
recommendations from both the WT report and the minority report will be quoted 
verbatim in the comparison table with corresponding section, page, and line 
numbers for ease of reference.

Julie, if you could complete the comparison this week that would be very 
helpful.

Your comments are welcome, it could be good if we can submit our final Task 1 
document to the OSC by May 28.

Best regards,
Olga

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5125 (20100518) __________


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5125 (20100518) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5132 (20100520) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5133 (20100520) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5148 (20100526) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5148 (20100526) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com