RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Public Comments on CSG Work Team Recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good question Victoria.  It might be better to say "for information in
amending their charters, as appropriate" or "for use in amending their
charters, as appropriate".  Thoughts?

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:55 AM
To: Julie Hedlund; Olga Cavalli
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Public Comments on CSG Work Team
Recommendations

 

Dear WT, 

 

Could someone explain what "for evaluation in amending their charters,
as appropriate" means? What is the origin of this language? 

 

Thank you and regards,  

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 20 July 2010 14:54
To: Olga Cavalli
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Public Comments on CSG Work Team
Recommendations

 

Dear Olga,

Here is a draft motion for you to consider.  Please feel free to edit
it, of course.  Let me know if I can help in any way.

Best regards,

Julie

DRAFT RESOLUTION:  Final Council Action on GCOT & CSG Deliverables

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 23 June 2010 meeting in Brussels,
accepted a set of deliverables submitted by the GNSO Council Operations
Work Team (GCOT) <
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team>  and the
Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT) <
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team> ;
 
WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum <
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gcot-csg-recommendations>
completed between 28 June 2010 and 18 July 2010 and a Staff Summary and
Analysis <
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html> has
been published; 
WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the these
deliverables as soon as possible after the end of the public comment
period;

WHEREAS, there were no public comments submitted that would amend any of
the GCOT or CSG-WT recommendations; 
  
NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:
 
RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the following set of GCOT
documents, without further modification, and directs Staff to publish a
new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) containing these
sections and chapters: 
*         Section 2.1-Council Member Term Limits <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-term-limits-24may1
0-en.pdf>  
*         Section 2.4-Board Seat Elections <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-board-seat-electio
ns-24may10-en.pdf>  
*         Section 3.8-Absences and Vacancies <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-absences-vacancies
-11jun10-en.pdf>  
*         Chapter 4.0-Voting <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-voting-11jun10-en.
pdf>   
*         Chapter 5.0-Statements and Disclosures of Interest <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-soi-doi-11jun10-en
.pdf>   
o   Note that two sections, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3, are not approved pending
further Staff action to be determined.  These sections are footnoted in
the document as "inactive" until subsequently approved by the OSC and
Council. 
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the following CSG-WT
deliverable and directs Staff to provide these recommendations to GNSO
Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for evaluation in amending their
charters, as appropriate:  
*         Recommended Common Operating Principles and Participation
Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and  <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.p
df> 
Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community Members <
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.p
df>  

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GCOT has successfully completed its
assignments, as chartered by the Operations Steering Committee (OSC);
therefore, the GNSO Council hereby discharges the GCOT with its
gratitude and appreciation for the team's dedication, commitment, and
thoughtful recommendations.  




On 7/19/10 4:36 PM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sounds good.  Hopefully a Councilor will make the motion and another
Councilor on the WT will second it.
 
Chuck
 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 3:27 PM
To: Olga Cavalli
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Public Comments on CSG Work Team
Recommendations

Dear Olga,

I will forward the draft motion to you as soon as it is ready.  I think
we can get it to you by tomorrow.

Best,

Julie


On 7/19/10 3:05 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Julie, let me know once the  motion is ready so we can move it.
Best
Olga

2010/7/19 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear Work Team members,

The public comment forum on the Task 1 recommendations ended yesterday.
There was only one comment and it was not substantive.  I have produced
a summary and analysis that is available here: 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html.  In
particular, the comment did not address the Work Team's report.  It
related to the ICANN comment process in general.

The next step is for the GNSO Council to approve the report.  Staff will
prepare a draft motion for consideration.

Best regards,

Julie 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5295 (20100720) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5295 (20100720) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com