RE: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: [gnso-osc-ops] GNSO Council Resolution: Approvalof GCOT and CSG Deliverables

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Olga,

 

When you do this tomorrow, please provide an explanation that the
substance of the motion did not change.  That way there should be
minimal concern about the fact that the revised motion is one day late.
If there are any complaints, it would just be a matter of considering
the changes as friendly amendments but that should not be necessary.

 

Chuck

 

From: olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:01 PM
To: Ken Bour; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; Gomes, Chuck; 'Olga Cavalli'
Cc: 'Robert Hoggarth'; julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: [gnso-osc-ops] GNSO Council Resolution:
Approvalof GCOT and CSG Deliverables

 

Thanks ken, I will sen new version of the motion tomorrow.
Regatds
Olga

Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar) 

________________________________

From: Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

Sender: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 

Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:49:29 -0400

To: <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Gomes,
Chuck'<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Olga Cavalli'<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>;
'Olga Cavalli'<olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc: 'Robert Hoggarth'<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>;
<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: [gnso-osc-ops] GNSO Council Resolution:
Approval of GCOT and CSG Deliverables

 

Olga:

 

I did not realize that you were in the process of submitting the motion
while I was still finalizing it.   I wonder if it would be too much
trouble to replace the one that you forwarded with the one I just sent
to the list since it is complete, has all the correct links, and latest
wording.    

 

Thanks,

 

Ken Bour

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ken Bour
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 6:45 PM
To: gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; 'Gomes, Chuck'; Olga
Cavalli; Olga Cavalli
Cc: Robert Hoggarth; julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] GNSO Council Resolution: Approval of GCOT and
CSG Deliverables

 

Olga, Chuck, GCOT, and CSG Teams: 

 

Julie asked me to forward this resolution to the appropriate email lists
-- today is the deadline for filing motions that will be voted at the
GNSO Council meeting on 5 August 2010.  

 

The resolution (below) is now cleaned and rewritten based upon the
latest feedback from those who have been participating in its
formulation.   You will notice a couple of important changes:  (1) there
is now a link to the new GOP (v2.0) which can also be found on page:
http://gnso.icann.org/council/docs.html; and (2) a new RESOLVE FURTHER
clause has been added to clarify that the GOP, if approved, becomes
effective immediately. 

 

My understanding is that Olga will submit this motion to the GNSO
Council this evening.  

 

Ken Bour

=======

 

GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION:  APPROVAL OF GCOT AND CSG-WT DELIVERABLES

 

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 23 June 2010 meeting in Brussels,
accepted a set of deliverables submitted by the GNSO Council Operations
Work Team (GCOT)
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team>  and the
Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT)
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team>
;

WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum
<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gcot-csg-recommendations>
completed between 28 June 2010 and 18 July 2010 and a Staff Summary and
Analysis
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html>
has been published;


WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the these
deliverables as soon as possible after the end of the public comment
period; and

WHEREAS, there were no public comments submitted that would amend any of
the GCOT or CSG-WT recommendations.

NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the following set of five GCOT
deliverables, without further modification: 

  o  Section 2.1-Council Member Term Limits
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-term-limits-24may
10-en.pdf>

  o  Section 2.4-Board Seat Elections
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-board-seat-electi
ons-24may10-en.pdf>

  o  Section 3.8-Absences and Vacancies
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-absences-vacancie
s-11jun10-en.pdf>

  o  Chapter 4.0-Voting
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-voting-11jun10-en
.pdf>

o  Chapter 5.0-Statements and Disclosures of Interest
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-soi-doi-11jun10-e
n.pdf>

    [Note that two sections, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3, are not approved pending
further Staff action to be determined.  These sections are footnoted in
the document as "inactive" until subsequently approved by the OSC and
Council]. 

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that Staff has incorporated the above Sections and
Chapters into a new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) <
http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-op-procedures-draft-05aug10-en.pdf>,
which becomes effective immediately upon adoption;  

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the following CSG-WT
deliverable
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.
pdf>, which is organized into two sections as follows: 

  o  Sections 2.1 & 2.2:  Recommended Common Operating Principles and
Participation Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and

      Constituencies, which Staff has incorporated into a new Chapter
7.0 in the above-referenced GNSO Operating Procedures; and

  o  Section 2.3:  Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community
Members. 

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to provide
Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above to GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies
for use in amending their charters, as appropriate; 
 
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council hereby expresses its gratitude
and appreciation to the GCOT and CSG Work Teams for their dedication,
commitment, and thoughtful recommendations.