Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FW: [gnso-osc] Global Outreach Program Recommendations - for adoption September 24

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Julie,
please note that yesterday there were some additional comments sent to our
list in relation with the document.
Best
Olga

2010/9/28 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Olga,
>
> Thank you for the helpful clarification.  We have a call scheduled for the
> usual time on Friday.  I will send around the document with embedded
> comments and highlights tomorrow.  I am waiting tin case there are further
> comments from the OSC.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> On 9/27/10 11:06 AM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Julie,
> What I am suggesting in relation with the document is that you only include
> questions and comments in the place that they correspond in the document.
> Final changes and additions to the text will be decided during the call,
> dont worry now about that.
> Also it could be useful if you can highlight those parts of the text that
> were indicated by Ron and Steve to be reviewed or commented.
> Please let me know if you have any question or doubt.
> Other comments are also welcome.
> best regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/9/27 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear Olga,
>
> I will set up a call.   I also will try to include comments in the
> document, but it is not clear to me in every case what changes I should
> include.  In those cases where it isn’t clear to me, I’ll include the
> comments and we can discuss on the call how to, or whether to, include them.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> On 9/26/10 6:36 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <
> http://olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>
> Thanks Chuck for your comments.
> I suggest that we make a conference call next Friday at our regular time to
> work on these questions and possible answers and comments.
>
> Julie, could you be so kind in:
>
> 1- doing the conf call arrangements.
>
> 2. Including in the body of the document all the requested comments, and
> suggested answers sent by me and other thay may contribute during this week.
> I think that this will make the revision easier.
>
> I welcome any other comments or suggestions.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/9/26 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx <http://cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>
> I suggest that any changes we make be presented in redline format to make
> it clear to the OSC members how we have responded to their comments.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
>  [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>] *On
> Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
>
> *Sent:* Monday, September 20, 2010 2:15 PM
>
> *To:* HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx> ;
> julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx <http://julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FW: [gnso-osc] Global Outreach Program
> Recommendations - for adoption September 24
>
>
> Dear Debbie,
> thanks for your email, I saw Ron and Phillip questions but I was in
> Lithuania for the IGF and had no time for reacting.
>
> Questions and comments have been already copied to our list.
>
> Here my impressions about them and perhaps a first step to an answer:
>
> Gender balance: About Avri´s comment related with gender balance; I fully
> agree so weI can check in the document and make the corresponding changes.
>
> 2.1.2 Membership of the Committee, 2nd paragraph notes: "The Committee
> membership should be long enough to allow the participation of host country
> and neighboring nations, and to leverage the outreach events and alert as
> many relevant parties to effectuate goals and activities."
>
> Perhaps examples can clarify this sentence.
>
> The INternet Governance Forum (IGF) has been organized for five years in
> different continents and countries (Athens, Rìo, Hyderabad, Sharm el Sheik,
> Vilnius, Kenya?) and after each year one representative of the hosting
> country is a member of the group that organizes the general agenda.
>
> In the South School on Internet Governance we copied the same example, in
> our academic committee we add each year one representative of the previous
> hosting country/institution, as the school rotates among countries in the
> Latin American region.
> The purpose of these inclusions is to recieve the benefits of the
> experience gatherered during the events in different places.
>
> If you agree with this idea we could try to capture this model into a
> clarifying text.
>
>
> 2.1.2.1 Representation on the Committee, 4th para notes: "Committee members
> should cooperate with the ICANN Fellowship selection team to be able to
> invite up to ten key people to each ICANN event, who may include people who
> represent numerous groups, such as leaders of academia, business
> associations, and non-governmental organizations."  Again, I do not
> understand what the sentence means, particularly who is being invited where?
>  Some background would hopefully bring some clarity to the intent.
>
>
> The idea behind this sentence is that the selection of the fellows in the
> "Fellowship program of ICANN" has a criteria that matches the outreach
> efforts in relation with diverse inclusion.
> Today there is only one representative of each region that makes this
> selection, so it could be good if the selection of the fellows is made
> jointly with a subgroup of the commitee devoted to this activity.
>
> Perhaps the committee should have a small steering committee and a wider
> and broader consulting group that feeds with ideas the steering committee.
>
> Your comments are welcome, if we agree in certain points and concepts then
> it will be easier to add or change the text in the document.
>
> Best regards
> Olga
>
>
> 2010/9/20 <HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
>
>
> Olga and Mike,
> Please see the email exchange below that contains several questions about
> the Task 2 Document.
>
> How would you like to proceed with a response?
>
> Thanks,
> Debbie
>
> Debra Y. Hughes, Senior Counsel
> American Red Cross
>
> Office of the General Counsel
> 2025 E Street, NW
> Washington, D.C. 20006
> Phone: (202) 303-5356
> Fax: (202) 303-0143
> HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx <avri@xxxxxxx>]
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:43 AM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <http://gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hughes, Debra Y.
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] Global Outreach Program Recommendations - for
> adoption September 24
>
> Hi,
>
> I would argue in favor of the criteria for diversity.  It is important to
> realize that the perspective that diversity of gender or community brings is
> a qualification.
>
> Perhaps in pure mathematics, this may not be the case.  But in any subject
> area that requires human perspective, qualifications are incomplete without
> gender and other perspectives.
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 17 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Philip Sheppard wrote:
>
> > Debbie,
> > Ron raises some valid questions for clarification here.
> > Please let us know.
> > Philip
> > Chair OSC
> >
> > From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:14 PM
> > To: 'Philip Sheppard'; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <http://gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Global Outreach Program Recommendations - for
> adoption September 24
> >
> > Chair,
> >
> > I read the CSG Work Team's recommendations with interest and find it on
> the whole to be a good work product.  I am particularly encouraged by the
> considerations given to 'translations' as this is one of the pillars that
> will support ICANN as it matures into a truly global institution.  Clearly,
> outreach is a very important and heretofore underserved component of ICANN
> and the initiatives noted in the recommendations are solid steps in the
> right direction.  A lot of good ideas but, as we all know, the devil is in
> the details and thus there is considerable work still ahead of us in this
> area.
> >
> > I have a couple of things that I wondered if the OSC might get some
> clarification on, as follows:
> >
> > 2.1.2 Membership of the Committee, 2nd paragraph notes: "The Committee
> membership should be long enough to allow the participation of host country
> and neighboring nations, and to leverage the outreach events and alert as
> many relevant parties to effectuate goals and activities."  I don't
> understand this sentence.  Can we get some clarification, as well as the
> Work Team's thinking behind the length of Committee member terms, how to
> manage 'institutional memory' with members rotating off the committee, and
> so forth?
> >
> > 2.1.2.1 Representation on the Committee, 4th para notes: "Committee
> members should cooperate with the ICANN Fellowship selection team to be able
> to invite up to ten key people to each ICANN event, who may include people
> who represent numerous groups, such as leaders of academia, business
> associations, and non-governmental organizations."  Again, I do not
> understand what the sentence means, particularly who is being invited where?
>  Some background would hopefully bring some clarity to the intent.
> >
> > My comment in regard to the first paragraph in this section (re:
> representation) is that with such a small committee, notwithstanding ICANN's
> principles of diversity, the committee's first priority (vis-à-vis selection
> criteria) should be based on an individual's qualifications in the realm of
> outreach rather than their gender or sector of the GNSO community from which
> they come.  The second priority (which some may argue should be the first)
> is geo location for all of the obvious reasons.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > RA
> >
> > Ronald N. Andruff
> > President
> >
> > RNA Partners, Inc.
> > 220 Fifth Avenue
> > New York, New York 10001
> > + 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
> >
> > From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>  [
> mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of
> Philip Sheppard
>
> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:23 AM
> > To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <http://gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [gnso-osc] Global Outreach Program Recommendations - for
> adoption September 24
> >
> > Fellow OSC members,
> > please find attached the final piece of work from the various teams
> within the OSC.
> > It is a recommendation on outreach from the CSG team, chaired by Olga
> Cavalli, in an effort led by Debbie Hughes.
> > Let me have your comments with a view to OSC adoption by September 24.
> >
> > After which, assuming a positive reception, we will send it to the GNSO
> Council.
> >
> > Philip
> > OSC Chair
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>