Re: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ken Stubbs wrote:

looks good to me. sorry i could not make the call today.

ken

Tony Holmes wrote:
> Ray
>
> I also support the charter.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* 23 April 2009 19:38
> *To:* ray@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* AW: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter
>
> Ray, I agree with the charter
>
> Regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Von:* owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] *Im Auftrag von *Ray Fassett
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 23. April 2009 19:43
> *An:* gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
> *Betreff:* [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter
>
> Hello Team, very productive teleconference call today, I think. While 
> our group may be small, I believe we are speaking freely allowing the 
> flow of ideas to form into concepts. As the Chair of this Work Team, I 
> am very pleased for this evolution and thank each one of you for 
> enabling it. Let’s keep it up.
> As a reminder, Julie has completed the one minor edit to our draft 
> Charter agreed to today by those on the call. Here is the link:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_work_team_draft_charter
>
> You will visibly see the minor edit (i.e. “before and after”) in the 
> 5^th bullet point under Section 1, Team Charter Goals. For those of 
> you not on the call today, the reason we reached rough consensus for 
> this minor change is due to the fact that there are already rules for 
> the establishment of new constituencies thus we felt the task was more 
> to “review” and provide any recommendations rather “prepare”. So, 
> again, a minor but accurate edit as we saw it.
> With this said, those on the call today agreed by rough consensus to 
> approve the draft Charter (with the aforementioned edit) as contained 
> at the link above and to communicate such approval by our Work Team to 
> the Steering Committee. We also agreed that those unable to attend 
> today’s conference call have the ability to weigh in with their 
> view/comments of the draft Charter by response to this e-mail. We 
> would consider no further comment to the draft Charter by end of day 
> next Tuesday, April 28, as non-objection by a Work Team member to our 
> communicating to the Steering Committee our Work Team’s approval of 
> the draft Charter. I will also note that our approval of the draft 
> Charter does not mean we can not later change it. It only means we’ve 
> accepted it.
> Our next call is scheduled for next Wednesday, April 29^th at 16:00 
> UTC which is 12:00 pm EST (note the one hour time change). It will 
> then go back to a two week cycle at the same 16:00 UTC time. Glen will 
> send a reminder for the call next week as she normally does and I will 
> send a brief agenda as well prior to the call.
> I expect that in the meantime, there will be new e-mail thread for you 
> to be on the lookout pertaining to the duty separation document we’ve 
> been discussing. For those not on the call today, I think you will be 
> able catch up on this status fairly quickly and I encourage you to 
> participate with your thoughts upon your review of it.
> Ray