<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-ops] FW: Comments on the Proposed GNSO structure
- To: gnso-osc-ops <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: Comments on the Proposed GNSO structure
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:00:37 -0700
Dear Work Team members,
Here are comments from Mike O'Conner concerning our request for input.
Best regards,
Julie
------ Forwarded Message
From: Mike O'Conner <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:49:05 -0700
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Comments on the Proposed GNSO structure
Hi Julie,
I think the draft is great. The only suggestion is the following --
Current draft
Constituencies would establish their own selection process for these
Administration Representatives, i.e., they may designate their elected
Constituency chair or choose to elect a different representative for this
function.
Proposed draft
Constituencies would establish their own selection process for these
Administration Representatives. optional; However they may not designate their
elected Constituency chair.
I really think it's a bad idea to allow the role-confusion that's likely to
arise from allowing Constituency Chairs to also serve in this administrative
role. So, at a minimum I'd leave that suggestion out of the language, but
better yet I'd prohibit that choice.
my 2 cents,
m
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web www.haven2.com <http://www.haven2.com>
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
------ End of Forwarded Message
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|