RE: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: GCOT Request for Input

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Julie,

 

Thanks for playing the postwoman's role!  I wonder, with the Chair's
approval, if you could also put these into a chart form for simple review?
In that way we can easily see all of the comments and yes/no's on one page.
You needn't get too detailed.  A simple one-pager will suffice.

 

Thanks,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

New York, New York 10001

 

www.rnapartners.com 

V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

F:  +1 212 481 2859 

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 2009-08-05 16:08
To: gnso-osc-ops
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: GCOT Request for Input

 

Dear Work Team members,

Here are comments from Steve Holsten.

Best regards,

Julie


------ Forwarded Message
From: Steve Holsten <sholsten@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:43:50 -0700
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: GCOT Request for Input

Julie, acting in my personal capacity only, I vote "NO" to the question: "Do
you think that the establishment of a new, additional body to address
specific responsibilities - as described herein - would better serve the
stakeholder groups that make up the GNSO, or not?"

I see no reason to separate these functions.

Regards, Steve


Stephen E. Holsten
Director, Policy & Compliance
VeriSign Naming Services
21345 Ridgetop Circle
Dulles, VA 20166
tel. 703-948-4357



------ End of Forwarded Message