RE: [gnso-osc-ops] meaning of 'in the lead' was Re: ACTIONS/SUMMARY: ...

["Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>]

Right, there is a homeless (let's use houseless) NCA.  But do not the
by-laws require the Chair and Vice Chairs to be elected from each house?  To
my knowledge there is nothing preventing either house from nominating the
houseless NCA for the Chair or a Vice Chair position.  What we do not want
to do is dictate that either house can't nomninate the houseless NCA.  As
long as we do not do this, each house is left to choose its own methods of
nomination including "who".

We recently had a similar discussion like this in the RyC where it is not a
requirement for our ICANN Board Nominating Committee rep be a member of the
RyC.  We can pick anyone.  My preference would be for each house to be able
to pick anyone, but is up to them to decide this vs. baking into the RoP
that they can not.  Or we could even say, "It is not a requirement for the
candidate nominated by each house for Chair or Vice Chair to be a member of
the respective house" (or something like this).

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:46 AM
To: gnso-osc-ops
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-ops] meaning of 'in the lead' was Re:
ACTIONS/SUMMARY: ...



On 9 Sep 2009, at 09:10, Ray Fassett wrote:

>  I am wondering if the 60% threshold requirement assumed one  
> candidate from each house.


As I recall nothing was discussed along these lines.
and the homeless NCA can also run.

a.