<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc-ops] ICANN Staff Document on Abstentions
- To: gnso-osc-ops <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-ops] ICANN Staff Document on Abstentions
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:28 +0200
Hi,
Just to add a thought.
While I am rather resistant to the idea of decreasing the denominator
for an abstention, I can see the possibility of extreme cases that
might warrant it. I like the stringent rules defined by Ken including
the requirement for approval by the opposite house in those case where
the SG group is not willing to require the vote. I would, however,
like to suggest an additional caveat - if the person asking to make
an abstention has ever uttered a single word, beyond the expression of
their conflict of interest, during the discussions on that topic in
either the council or any of its WGs then that abstention must be
deemed voluntary.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|