Re: [gnso-osc-ops] ACTION ITEM: Final Draft Abstention Procedures

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

+1


On 3 Feb 2010, at 18:08, Ron Andruff wrote:

> Dear Ray,
> 
> I am good to go with the KB version or those amendments noted by WUK.  I 
> think that the Work Team did an exhaustive review of this topic and thank 
> staff for their excellent input.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> RA
> 
> Ronald N. Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> 220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor
> New York, New York 10001
> 
> www.rnapartners.com
> V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11
> F:  +1 212 481 2859
> 
> From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 2010-02-02 04:50
> To: julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [gnso-osc-ops] ACTION ITEM: Final Draft Abstention Procedures
> 
> All
> 
> sorry for being a little beyond the deadline (but on Samoa is still 
> Monday...).
> 
> I was still not convinced with the large text to be inserted in the RoPs 
> themselves. I understand that all the details are important to understand the 
> recommendation and I appreciate very much Kens diligent work on this. But I 
> may have a "German" approach with regards to forms and would like to leave my 
> suggestion for your consideration: a small chapter 4.5 with an extended annex 
> (see attached).
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Von: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] Im 
> Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2010 00:25
> An: gnso-osc-ops
> Betreff: [gnso-osc-ops] ACTION ITEM: Final Draft Abstention Procedures
> 
> Dear Work Team members,
> 
> As discussed in today’s call, attached in .doc and .pdf are the final 
> recommended changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures to address abstentions.  
> As requested on the call, Ken Bour has revised the latest version, which was 
> based on the discussion on the 06 January Work Team call, to incorporate the 
> procedures into Section 4.0 — Voting as a new subsection 4.5 — Abstentions.   
> Please note that Ken identified and made changes in a few other places within 
> Section 4 to maintain consistency and integrity throughout the entire set of 
> voting procedures.  Because he was changing existing approved language, he 
> left track changes on in 4.1-4.4, but accepted all of the changes in 4.5 per 
> Ray’s request. 
> 
> ACTION ITEM: It was agreed on today’s call that unless Work Team members 
> specifically object to these final recommended procedures no later than 
> Monday, 01 February, they will be considered to be agreed to by the Work 
> Team.  If there are no objections, the Work Team will forward the recommended 
> procedures to ICANN Legal staff for review.  Once that review is complete the 
> Work Team will forward the procedures to the Operations Steering Team for 
> consideration with the goal of GNSO Council approval at at the Council’s 10 
> March meeting at the ICANN meeting in Nairobi, Kenya.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Julie
> 
> 
>