RE: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for weighing in, Avri, but I'm not sure where you fall on this one.
Can you clarify that for me/us?

Thanks,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
President

RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:14 PM
To: gnso-osc-ops
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures -
section 5 statements of interest


Hi,

i sit on the OSC as well and basically watched this happen and found that i
was neither so in favor as to say '+1'  nor so against as to say anything at
all.

i did not disagree with the changes, but was not sure about the practice of
not checking with the WT first.  now seeing it in the WT, i think i should
have said something.

a.

On 16 Apr 2010, at 10:52, Ron Andruff wrote:

> Ray and all,
> 
> As you may recall, I sit on the OSC as well, so I had suggested that the
OSC make this recommendation to the GNSO when forwarding the revised OP on
to them.  Philip has chosen to send this back to us for reasons I don't
understand.  That being the case, I would suggest that we ask staff to
incorporate this recommendation as a footnote and send it back to the OSC.
I do NOT think that this is an issue for further discussion within the team,
unless other Work Team members think differently.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> RA
> 
> Ronald N. Andruff
> President
> 
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> 220 Fifth Avenue
> New York, New York 10001
> + 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
> 
> From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ray Fassett
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 8:05 AM
> To: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures -
section 5 statements of interest
> 
> Team, fyi below.
> 
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:43 AM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Ray Fassett'
> Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of
interest
> 
> Indeed I support Steve's additional thought re a list of contractors.
> Ray, please add to your revised section 5.
> Philip
> --------------------------
> A related issue to consider:  if this system is to work as proposed, there
needs to be an authoritative, current and publicly available list of all
"entities with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement
(e.g. Registries, Registrars, Consultants,etc)."  Otherwise, a person who
has a "compensation arrangement" with such an entity on an issue totally
unrelated to ICANN might well be unaware that this is a relationship which
s/he is supposed to disclose.   I don't think such a list exists today, is
ICANN in a position to prepare, maintain and post it?