<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Revised Section 3.8 and Chapter 4.0
- To: <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Revised Section 3.8 and Chapter 4.0
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 20:34:01 +0200
For me as well
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Deutsche Telekom AG
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Heinrich-Hertz-Str. 3-7
D - 64295 Darmstadt
+49 2244 873999 (Tel.)
+49 2151 5300 5206 (PC-Fax)
+49 151 1452 5867 (Mobil)
http://www.telekom.com <http://www.telekom.com/>
Deutsche Telekom AG
Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender)
Vorstand: René Obermann (Vorsitzender)
Timotheus Höttges (stellvertretender Vorsitzender)
Hamid Akhavan, Manfred Balz, Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme, Guido
Kerkhoff, Thomas Sattelberger
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE50478376
________________________________
Von: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Ron Andruff
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Mai 2010 18:39
An: 'Ken Bour'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Revised Section 3.8 and Chapter 4.0
Works for me, Ken.
Thanks,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
President
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
________________________________
From: Ken Bour [mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:35 PM
To: 'Ron Andruff'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Revised Section 3.8 and Chapter 4.0
GCOT Members:
In light of Ron's response to my comment about limiting the selection
of a TA to the "membership" of a SG, I propose the following language change to
4.5.3-c(i):
"In selecting a Temporary Alternate, the appointing organization is
expected to shall choose, from within its membership ranks, a responsible
individual who is not a current voting GNSO Council member, but is otherwise
knowledgeable on the matter at issue and qualified to represent the appointing
organization's interests."
Will these edits accomplish the objective?
Ken
From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 10:47 AM
To: 'Ken Bour'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Revised Section 3.8 and Chapter 4.0
Dear all,
I accept the modifications in Section 3.8 in total.
I accept the modifications in Section 4.0, with the following responses
to Ken's comments:
* Re: 4.5.3. c, i [Comment KAB2], specifically limit a SG in
choosing a TA from within its organization (i.e. bonafide member) I feel the
TA must be a bonafide member of the SG. If an SG feels that it needs to take
expert advice on a matter before the GNSO, it should do so and then instruct
its TA member on how to vote.
* Re: 4.5.3. c, i [Comment KAB3], specifically We probably
don't want the TA remedy to become a 'back door' for an otherwise term-limited
Councilor to reappear at Council meetings as a substitute voter. Unless GCOT
thinks it should undertake a new task to draft broader GNSO Council membership
criteria, I recommend at least highlighting "Term Limits" to avoid potential
confusion. I agree that we do not want to leave a loophole that someone will
surely try to take advantage of sooner or later. One thing that has been
lacking in ICANN for the past 10-years, but has improved somewhat in the last
few, is having 'fresh faces' replace those who have 'squatted' on the GNSO
council for too many years. For this reason, I feel strongly that a former
councilor who was term limited out of the council should be excluded from
serving as a TA. Having said that, if the Work Team feels that (1) the term
limited ex-councilor would be more capable to get up-to-speed on an issue more
quickly than another member; or (2) the likelihood of an ex-councilor TA having
an SOI and bio already on file with ICANN, meaning one less issue to be
addressed, I would concede my stated position to agree to allow a term-limited
councilor being put forward as a TA.
As for highlighting "Term Limits", I agree with Ken's recommendation.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
President
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Bour
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:44 PM
To: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] Revised Section 3.8 and Chapter 4.0
GCOT Members:
Attached are revised versions of Section 3.8-Absences & Vacancies and
Chapter 4.0-Voting. Per the team's direction on 19 May, I accepted all prior
edits; the attached documents primarily show revisions pertaining to House NCAs
remedies.
As I indicated in my earlier note to the list, the changes were more
extensive than I anticipated; however, I believe that these versions accomplish
the team's intention to permit Proxy Voting and Temporary Alternate remedies
for the two House NCAs.
I made a few additional edits not related specifically to the NCA issue
because, pretty much every time I reconsider these procedures, I notice
language that can be improved and/or clarified. Since time is of the essence,
I won't attempt to enumerate all of the edits in this email because they are
redlined and also commented where I thought additional explanation would help
rationalize the amendment.
I will stay abreast of list email traffic and be prepared to work
diligently toward creating a final clean version by end of business tomorrow.
Ken Bour
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|