Re: [gnso-osc] FW: GNSO Operating Procedures Final Drafts
Don't mention it Ray. Thanks for your sterling work on the OSC. Stéphane Le 14/09/09 18:18, « Ray Fassett » <ray@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Thanks for the input Stephane, very helpful. > > Ray > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 5:16 AM > To: Ray Fassett; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-osc] FW: GNSO Operating Procedures Final Drafts > > Thanks Ray, > > I think that makes it a lot clearer. > > Stéphane > > > Le 13/09/09 23:50, « Ray Fassett » <ray@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> Does the language below make things clearer? >> >> iii. The leading candidate will be defined as the one with the highest >> score. The score will be determined by adding together the voting >> percentages attained from each house. The highest percentage attainable > in >> each house is 100. Thus the maximum score a candidate can achieve is 200 > as >> a result of attaining 100% of the votes from the contracted party house > and >> 100% from the non-contracted party house (100% + 100% = score of 200). >> >> Ray >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 4:16 PM >> To: Avri Doria; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx >> Cc: Ray Fassett >> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] FW: GNSO Operating Procedures Final Drafts >> Importance: High >> >> Thanks Avri. Yes, I think people who understand the process like we do > won't >> have any need for any further explanation but, as I pointed out and you > seem >> to agree, the doc would be much easier to grasp for the non ICANN insiders >> if this was explicitly stated in it. >> >> Once again, just a small thing but one which may help make the doc more >> readable. >> >> Stéphane >> >> >> Le 13/09/09 22:07, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit : >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> quick answer(not that this help the doc in itself) >>> >>> 100% in contracted parties house + 100% in non-contracted parties >>> house = maximum of 200 possible score. >>> >>> a. >>> >>> On 13 Sep 2009, at 20:53, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Chuck, >>>> >>>> Just one small comment on article 4.1.b.iii which seems unclear to >>>> me in the way it¹s written. It makes it hard for anyone not well >>>> versed in the voting system to understand where the 200 score comes >>>> from. >>>> >>>> Otherwise the document looks fine. >>>> >>>> Stéphane >>> >>> >> >> > > Attachment:
smime.p7s |