<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
- To: <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:20:44 +0200
Indeed, Philip, you could understand it that way. The only chance to clear this
issue is imposing a voting obligation for council members. Is that acceptable??
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von
Philip Sheppard
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. September 2009 09:36
An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx; 'Council GNSO'
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
Chuck wrote: Abstaining is not the same as not voting in my opinion.
David Mayer wrote: There is a real difference between abstaining and not voting.
Would either of you like to explain it ?
If you are correct are we in the new rules giving Council members present at a
meeting four options:
yes
no
abstain
not voting
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|