<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc] FOR ADOPTION May 15 - GCOT Ops Section 2.1 term limits
- To: <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] FOR ADOPTION May 15 - GCOT Ops Section 2.1 term limits
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 08:52:12 -0400
This looks okay to me. If I understand it correctly, the two ways to get a
special circumstance are independent of each other and both could be used if
one failed. If that is correct, I support this.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed May 05 04:28:47 2010
Subject: [gnso-osc] FOR ADOPTION May 15 - GCOT Ops Section 2.1 term limits
Dear OSC members,
FOR REVIEW AND ADOPTION by May 15
Please find attached a revised Section 2.1 of the GNSO operating manual
covering term-limits for Council members.
The proposal from GCOT seems sound and the high voting thresholds for
exceptions are consistent with thresholds for other issues.
I propose until May 15 for your approvals or other comments.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|