RE: [gnso-osc] Motion to Approve CCT Recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mason,

I am sure that you and the CCT thought you were finished, but I would
like to suggest one more task that I hope will be fairly easy.  As CCT
chair, would you please ask the CCT members to take a look at the public
comments and the comment summary and analysis and let us know whether WT
members think any edits to the report should be considered as a result
of those comments.  Please provide the OSC and me any feedback you
receive from the WT by Wednesday of next week, 9 June as well as your
thoughts as chair.

Note that there were only four comments submitted.

Thanks,

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 7:14 AM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] Motion to Approve CCT Recommendations
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> It is all well and good that you say so and that Julie says so.  I
> think we need to hear that the WT has said so.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On 3 Jun 2010, at 11:50, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Avri,
> > please re-read my last mail.
> > I have not said the comments are irrelevant.
> > I have read them all and summarised them.
> > Julie Hedlund has also written a longer summary.
> >
> > There is but one comment of substance that supports the work and can
> be factored
> > into implementation.
> >
> > Philip
> >
>