Re: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1 constituencies

[Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>]

Good idea

Philip Sheppard
AIM
www.aim.be

On 9 Jun 2010, at 15:33, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wonder if it would be wise to put a motion on the table in time for
> the 23 June Council meeting in Brussels to open a 21-day comment  
> period
> on these recommendations as well as the rest of the GCOT GNSO  
> procedures
> recommendations.  If the OSC doesn't approve the recommendations on 19
> June, we could drop the motion.  If we do approve them, we could get  
> the
> 21-day comment period started sooner and move to closer on these  
> issues
> sooner.
>
> Would it make sense to have Julie or Ken draft a motion in that  
> regard?
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:14 AM
> > To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1
> > constituencies
> >
> > Dear OSC members,
> > FOR REVIEW AND ADOPTION by June 19
> > Please find attached a report from the Constituency Stakeholder Group
> > (CSG).
> > The report is task one of their two tasks.
> >
> > It includes recommendations on three sub-tasks:
> > a) Common Operating Principles for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
> > Constituencies
> > b) Participation Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
> > Constituencies
> > c) GNSO Database of Community Members
> >
> > There is also a substantial minority report with a more fundamental
> > approach.
> >
> > In view of the report's length (20 pages) and the upcoming meeting of
> > the OSC on June 19 in Brussels, I propose starting our discussion
> > period today June 1 with a view to adoption at the June 19 meeting.  
> > It
> > would help therefore if any issues you wish to raise, are made by e-
> > mail in advance of June 19.
> > Many thanks.
> >
> > Philip
> > Chair OSC