ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-osc] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS

  • To: <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-osc] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:39:19 +0100

Colleagues,

The first "Resolved" of the a.m. motion (see 
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions) reads:

        RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by 
the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned 
document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum.

I wonder whether the GCOT has submitted and the OSC has approved the proposed 
revisions to section 5.0 in the version presented. To my knowledge the OSC 
approval was given including  the DOI. In this case I'd like to suggest a 
friendly amendment as follows:

        RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by 
the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned 
document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum

Philp's and Ray's advise would be helpful.

There are still references to DOI left in the revision which I've removed (see 
attached).



Wolf-Ulrich Knoben 

 <<GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15 Oct 
2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc>> 

Attachment: GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15 Oct 2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc
Description: GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15 Oct 2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy