ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc] RE: GNSO Council Proxy Procedures

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] RE: GNSO Council Proxy Procedures
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:50:14 +0200

On Chuck's last point, I am not sure that would be consistent with the way this 
works for non NCA councillors, as proxies can only be given within the same SG, 
they do not cover the entire house.

I think we have to be careful not to create a situation where the NCAs enjoy 
benefits that elected councillors do not.


Le 5 avr. 2011 à 01:03, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

> The current GOP limit of one proxy per Council NCA follows the same 
> limitation that is true for each SG Councilor.  If, for example, the RySG had 
> two Councilors absent for a meeting (quorum rules notwithstanding), the 
> attending Councilor could still exercise only one proxy vote per motion. The 
> other absent Councilor votes would be recorded as “absent.” [Gomes, Chuck]  
> If it is important to maintain this, then we could just allow an NCA to give 
> the proxy to any Councilor in the applicable house.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy