<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
- To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:43:43 -0400
when they are an NCA?
or when it is last minute - similar to having leave in the middle of a meeting.
a.
On 16 May 2011, at 12:00, Ron Andruff wrote:
> To understand this better: The notification should, where applicable, be sent
> by the Proxy Giver's appointing organization.
>
> Can someone explain where this is not applicable?
>
> Thank you,
>
> RA
>
> Ronald N. Andruff
>
> RNA Partners, Inc.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:27 AM
> To: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
>
>
> According to the existing process the proxy notification should be sent by
> the Proxy Giver'S appointing organization (if applicable)
>
>
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag
> von Philip Sheppard
> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 12:04
> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
>
>
> In view of the comments from Legal, I propose this new version of the rules.
> I have highlighted in yellow changes (all additions) from v5.
>
> Comments, expressions of support with a view to OSC adoption by May 26 please.
>
> Philip
> OSC Chair
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|