ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6

  • To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:43:43 -0400

when they are an NCA?

or when it is last minute - similar to having leave in the middle of a meeting.

a.


On 16 May 2011, at 12:00, Ron Andruff wrote:

> To understand this better: The notification should, where applicable, be sent 
> by the Proxy Giver's appointing organization.
> 
> Can someone explain where this is not applicable?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> RA
> 
> Ronald N. Andruff
> 
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:27 AM
> To: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
> 
> 
> According to the existing process the proxy notification should be sent by 
> the Proxy Giver'S appointing organization (if applicable)
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag 
> von Philip Sheppard
> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 12:04
> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
> 
> 
> In view of the comments from Legal, I propose this new version of the rules.
> I have highlighted in yellow changes (all additions) from v5.
> 
> Comments, expressions of support with a view to OSC adoption by May 26 please.
> 
> Philip
> OSC Chair





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy