Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Document for discussion: 17 MARCH at 15:00 UTC

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

After sending this, I realized one problem of 
trying to include both in and out-of-scope in the 
single PDP is that the vote to start it is 
only >33% within scope and >66% out of scope. I 
guess that this could be addressed by separating 
the out-of-scope part into a separate motion, or 
including it as a provisional requirement if it 
attracts a sufficiently high vote.
Alan

At 17/03/2009 02:15 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> In preparation for the meeting, I have drafted a 
> proposed motion for the GNSO Council. We have 
> not yet decided on all of the points in the 
> motion, but I thought that putting a strawman on 
> the table will better focus our discussions.
> In particular, my rationale for the following issues is as follows:
>
> - Registrar transfer during the RGP: I have no 
> problem with putting this into the IRTP-A scope. 
> I am equally happy leaving it here, but based on 
> the Issues Report, I think that it may 
> complicate this PDP far more than it will the IRPT-A one.
> - I have not tried to completely formulate the 
> resultant WG Charter. This could be done if it is advisable.
> - PDPs come in two flavours, those that 
> formulate a consensus policy, and those that 
> constitute advice to the Board or staff. The new 
> gTLD or Contractual Conditions PDP (PDP06) are 
> examples of the latter type. Unless there is 
> some rule against it, my preference would be to 
> have this PDP include both aspects, as it seems 
> foolish not to capture the advice-type 
> recommendations if and when they come up in the 
> deliberations. I can give some examples of why I 
> think this is important during the meeting.
> I do apologize for the late timing of this. The 
> backlog of work when I returned from Mexico City 
> coupled with some major computer problems 
> occupied far too much of my time. On the poitive 
> side, the document is under one page long.
> Alan
>
>
>
> At 16/03/2009 03:47 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > A  Post-Expiry Domain Name Recovery call has 
> > been scheduled for tomorrow, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 15:00 UTC.
> > (08:00 PST, 11:00 am EST, 16:00 CET)
> >
> > Dial-in details below:
> > (Please note that the dial-in numbers have 
> > changed from those some of you have been using regularly)
> > Pass code: PEDNR
> > (Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery)
> >
> > The call will be recorded and transcribed as 
> > usual and these are posted on the calendar page:
> > http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
> >
> > Currently subscribed to the drafting team list:
> >
> > Avri Doria - GNSO Council chair (subscribed to all lists as observers)
> > Chuck Gomes - GNSO Council vice chair (subscribed to all lists as observers)
> > Matt Serlin - Mark Monitor Registrar constituency
> > Steve Holsten - Registry constituency
> > Jeff Eckhaus - DemandMedia Registrar constituency
> > Mike Rodenbaugh - CBUC GNSO Council rep.
> > Alan Greenberg - ALAC
> >
> > ICANN staff:
> > Liz Gasster
> > Marika Konings
> > Margie Milam
> >
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > Thank you.
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Glen