RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Draft resolution - Version 2

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks.  Alan

At 18/03/2009 02:52 PM, Holsten, Steve wrote:

>  Alan, I'm fine with these edits.  Best, Steve
>
>
> Stephen E. Holsten
> Director, Policy & Compliance
> VeriSign Naming Services
> 21345 Ridgetop Circle
> Dulles, VA 20166
> tel. 703-948-4357
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 11:58 PM
> To: PEDNR DT
> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Draft resolution - Version 2
>
> Attached is a revised version of the resolution.  In addition to some
> word-smithing to make the sentences flow, I have made two changes which
> I would like your comments on.
>
> 1. On consideration, I felt that the term "best practices" that Chuck
> added did not really encompass the breadth of non-consensus policy
> recommendations that may result from this PDP. I have used the words
> "recommendations regarding best practices, ICANN compliance processes
> and possible RAA changes". This does not oblige the PDP group to address
> all of these, but it makes clear that all are allowed. The reason I feel
> this is important is that in recent times, Council has taken a strong
> position of PDP WGs not extending their scope on their own volition, so
> if we feel that all of these type of recommendations are within scope,
> we should make it clear at the onset, and not have some later Council
> mis-interpret our intent.
>
> 2. During our discussion today, it was suggested that this present PDP
> process could comment on and make recommendations to the IRTP-C group. I
> realized that although the mechanics or logistics of such a transfer are
> reasonably placed in the IRTP-C domain, it is really this PDP that
> should consider if the need for such a transfer is required from a
> registrant point-of-view. If this change is particularly troublesome to
> this group, we can revert to the wording in the previous version, but I
> do think that this adds some clarity.
>
> A reminder that if we want to make the agenda of this month's Council
> meeting, we need closure on this motion by Thursday.
>
> Regards, Alan