From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 April 2009 13:05:21 EDT
To: "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Intended friendly amendment to the PEDNR motion
Avri and Allan,
The intended friendly amendment to PEDNR I am asking for is to replace
the first paragraph of the RESOLVE section to the following:
"to initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP) to address the issues
identified in the Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Issues Report.
The charter for this PDP should instruct the Working Group: (i) that
should consider recommendations for best practices as well as or
of recommendations for Consensus Policy; (ii) that to inform its
should pursue the availability of further information from ICANN
compliance staff to understand how current RAA provisions and
policies regarding deletion, auto-renewal, and recovery of domain
during the RGP are enforced; and (iii) that it should specifically
consider the following questions:"
Reason: We just approved a set of amendments to the RAA and we have a
group forming to discuss further changes to the RAA. For the RrC, it
seems onerous to include the potential for RAA changs in every PDP
gets initiated and that's what the original motion portends. Item (ii)
in the above amendmended paragraph uses language straight out of the
recommendations in the Issues report.
Thanks for considering it.