Thanks Marika. Seems to make sense. But as I said, we should strive to
have some concrete ideas on solutions for a follow up Workshop in Korea
(call it an interim report or whatever you want).
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] PDP Timelines - milestone dates
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 5:56 am
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear All,
As requested, please find attached an overview of PDP timelines as
discussed on yesterdayâ??s call. Based on the data from previous PDPs, I
have included some suggested milestone dates for the PEDNR for your
review. Do note that most of the past WGs would meet on a weekly basis,
which might not be the case for the PEDNR WG and is likely to affect the
timeline.
A wiki page is being created and I will notify you as soon as it is up
and running.
With regard to the workshop, please note that a preliminary announcement
has already been posted on the Sydney web site (see
http://syd.icann.org/node/3869).
With best regards,
Marika
On 5/27/09 9:52 PM, "Avri Doria"
<https://email.secureserver.net/avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I sort of acted like a chair for the meeting.
1. Reviewed charter proposed by Tim
- further discussion and review needed
- charter to be put in wiki (don't know who is doing this, i
will if no one does it by the time i look for it next)
- goal is to have it on agenda for 24 June. Needs to be
complete by 10 June.
2. Charter needs to include milestones. Marika to help build a
reasonable first approximation based on Policy Staff aggregate
experience in the evolving GNSO WG experience to date.
3. We need to have a report of some sort out for Seoul.
- it can be a preliminary report - little more then restatements
of the issues report + issues that came up in public comment and a
compendium of constituency reports.
- It can be the initial report (i do not think there is a precise
definition of what needs to be in an initial report. In my time I
have seen initial reports that were like preliminary report. I have
also seen initial reports that looked like a draft initial report.
this groups needs to figure out what it needs to do to cover the
subject mater.
- it can be something in between the first two alternatives.
Note, the by-laws require a constituency and public comment
period. They do not limit it to one.
4. An announcement of the workshop in Sydney should go out soon and
should include information about the WG that is being formed. work
was still needed on organizing the workshop. A wiki page would be
built for collaborate effort's sake, though covnersations are also
encouraged on the list on directly with Marika.
5. We had initial conversations on role:
- it looked like Tim was a good candidate for Council liaison
- it looked like Alan was a good candidate for interim chair, with
a regular chair being selected after the group was fully formed. I
asked Alan to take on the interim role immediately and there were not
objections
6. There was mixed opinion on:
- the use of milestone dates as a forcing function
- whether tools beyond email, teleconference and f2f meeting
should be used.
- whether the use of tools other then the base needed to be
mandated in a charter.
a.