Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] For your review - Updated PEDNR WG Charter

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am happy with the text of the charter.  The time line may be 
problematic. If"T" is the 24th of June (GNSO Council meeting in 
Sydney), we have
Initial Report: T + 170 days = 11 Dec 2009
First comment period ends: T + 190 days = 31 Dec 2009
Preliminary Final Report: T + 210 days = 20 Jan 2009

That puts the comment period right over the Christmas break. If we 
slip a few weeks, it puts pulling together the Initial Report over 
that period. Neither are acceptable.
I think that we have two options:

1. Decrease the first two periods to 150 and 170. That puts the 
deadline for the initial report at 3 weeks after Seoul, presuming we 
could have worked out an acceptable solution during a face-to-face 
meeting, and give a longer period for final drafting factoring in Christmas.
2. Increase the last two periods to 200 and 220, putting the deadline 
for comments at 01 Jan 10 and the report deadline at 30 Jan 10.
I can live with either. Option 2 gives us a bit more time, but is 
still agressive.
Alan


At 08/06/2009 06:15 AM, you wrote:
> Others (especially Alan, Mike O.), please share your views on the 
> PEDNR WG Charter with the mailing list so Tim can submit it to the 
> Council in time for consideration at its meeting in Sydney.
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
>
> On 6/4/09 1:02 PM, "Tim Ruiz" <<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Marika,
>
> Thanks, it looks good to me. I'll wait to submit the motion to the
> Council until everyone agrees it's good to go (or at least those that
> care to comment). But you might want to remind me :)
>
> Rob has agreed to present the theory/practice piece of the workshop.
> He'll need to know how much time he has and other details necessary. Do
> we put on this mail list? Or will you be coordinating with him? This
> group will also want to see at least a draft of his presentation before
> hand.
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] For your review - Updated PEDNR WG Charter
> From: Marika Konings <<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, June 04, 2009 3:28 am
> To: "<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx" 
> <<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached an updated version of the proposed PEDNR WG
> Charter, following yesterday's discussion.
>
> This document as well as the revised text have been posted on the PEDNR
> Wiki which is now up and running on
> <https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/index.cgi?post_expiration_domain_name_recovery_wg>https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/index.cgi?post_expiration_domain_name_recovery_wg.
>
>
> Please share your comments and suggestions on the mailing list. A next
> call will be scheduled for Wednesday 10 June at 18.00 UTC.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika