Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] cost of recovery during Registrar grace period.
- To: "gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] cost of recovery during Registrar grace period.
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:23:55 +0000
On 10 Jan 2010, at 00:07, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:
> Hello Michele
> This working group happens to be a GNSO working group, but the issue of
> Post-Expiry Domain Name Recovery isn't an issue that is gTLD specific. So,
> why is this ccTLD example "beyond the scope of this working group?"
Because there are well over 200 ccTLDs with very different policies?
Just to give you ONE example
.be - if the domain is not renewed will go straight into quarantine. The
quarantine release fee charged by the registry operator is several multiples of
the registration / renewal fee
Because this _is_ a GNSO working group not a CCNSO working group?
> Perhaps some of the Registrar Members of this WG could state whether or not
> the same practice prevails among gTLD Registrars for gTLD domains.
What makes you think that the difference in price is caused by the registrar?
Mr Michele Neylon
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845