Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] cost of recovery during Registrar grace period.

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10 Jan 2010, at 00:07, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:

> Hello Michele
> 
> This working group happens to be a GNSO working group, but the issue of 
> Post-Expiry Domain Name Recovery isn't an issue that is gTLD specific. So, 
> why is this ccTLD example "beyond the scope of this working group?"


Because there are well over 200 ccTLDs with very different policies?


Just to give you ONE example

.be - if the domain is not renewed will go straight into quarantine. The 
quarantine release fee charged by the registry operator is several multiples of 
the registration / renewal fee


Because this _is_ a GNSO working group not a CCNSO working group?


> 
> Perhaps some of the Registrar Members of this WG could state whether or not 
> the same practice prevails among gTLD Registrars for gTLD domains. 

What makes you think that the difference in price is caused by the registrar?


Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business  
Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845