Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Proposed agenda

[Michael Young <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello all,


I unfortunately cannot attend the call at this time due to a conflict, but I do 
have concerns around the agenda as follows:


1) I am not sure at this point, given the state of the draft report which does 
not really offer recommendations based on recognized consensus positions and 
any subsequent minority reports included, that I am sure what final work 
objective we are tracking to. I would like to see that objective(s) clarified 
at this point in time.

2) Based on what objectives the group agrees to, I would like to see a 
trackable project plan with identified milestones and clear success criteria to 
get us to the end goal. I feel we are drifting a little sideways and to be 
straight it's feels like we could end up in circle discussions indefinitely if 
we don't make an effort to wind the work up to an agreed upon achievement.

3) Just for the record, there was at least one error on my last survey 
responses, hopefully this will be corrected shortly. 


Thanks for your attention.


Michael Young



Sent from my iPad

On 2010-07-06, at 9:47 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> Please find below the proposed agenda for today’s PEDNR WG meeting.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> ===================
> 
> Proposed Agenda - PEDNR WG Meeting 6 July 2010
> 
> Roll Call
> Evaluation / review of Information & Consultation Session at ICANN meeting in 
> Brussels (see http://brussels38.icann.org/node/12511 for transcript and 
> recording)
> Public Comment Forum & Survey (Please preview the latest version of the 
> public survey at http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AUYRGHCV4/Preview)
> Next steps & Confirm date for next meeting
> 
>