RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Summary and analysis of public comment forum and survey published

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Marika.    I appreciate Staff's efforts analyze this feedback.

Results from the survey tool are interesting, and I'm still going over
all the responses, but I have a suggestion for the group:

Should we allow anonymous entries?  There are several who have listed
their names / affiliations as  "Anonymous", "Domainer", "ich" or first
name /  initials.  I just want to ensure that that each respondent is
identifiable.

Thoughts on this?

Thanks--

J.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Summary and analysis of public comment forum
and survey published
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, August 23, 2010 7:20 am
To: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

 Summary and analysis of public comment forum and survey published Dear
All,
 
 Please note that the summary and analysis of the public comment forum
and survey has been published (see
http://forum.icann.org/lists/pednr-initial-report/msg00009.html). Nine
contributions were received to the public comment forum, in addition to
412 responses to the survey. Please review the documents prior to our
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 24 August. The documents have also been posted
on the wiki (https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/).
 
 With best regards,
 
 Marika