Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Summary and analysis of public comment forum and survey published

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

For the record, the survey was set up in such a way that only one submission
per computer was accepted, although I guess there are ways around that.
Also, 197 respondents did provide an email address in response to question 3
(which was optional) so further analysis would be required to determine
whether those that did not complete the name / affiliation entry did provide
a valid email address, which could be considered as a form of
identification, I presume.

Best regards,

Marika

On 23/08/10 16:04, "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> 
> On 23 Aug 2010, at 14:56, James M. Bladel wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Thanks, Marika.    I appreciate Staff's efforts analyze this feedback.
>> 
>> Results from the survey tool are interesting, and I'm still going over
>> all the responses, but I have a suggestion for the group:
>> 
>> Should we allow anonymous entries?  There are several who have listed
>> their names / affiliations as  "Anonymous", "Domainer", "ich" or first
>> name /  initials.  I just want to ensure that that each respondent is
>> identifiable.
>> 
>> Thoughts on this?
> 
> I'd say no for one very simple reason - we have no way of knowing if they have
> "voted" once only or multiple times
> 
> A second reason would be the bylaws themselves, they clearly indicate that
> commenters (and I'd include people voting in polls) need to be identified
> 
> 
>> 
>> Thanks--
>> 
>> J.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Summary and analysis of public comment forum
>> and survey published
>> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, August 23, 2010 7:20 am
>> To: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Summary and analysis of public comment forum and survey published Dear
>> All,
>> 
>> Please note that the summary and analysis of the public comment forum
>> and survey has been published (see
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/pednr-initial-report/msg00009.html). Nine
>> contributions were received to the public comment forum, in addition to
>> 412 responses to the survey. Please review the documents prior to our
>> meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 24 August. The documents have also been posted
>> on the wiki (https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/).
>> 
>> With best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> 
> 
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://blacknight.mobi/
> http://mneylon.tel
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> US: 213-233-1612 
> UK: 0844 484 9361
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> 
> PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>