RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Agenda of today's meeting
- To: "'PEDNR'" <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Agenda of today's meeting
- From: "Berry Cobb" <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:52:58 -0700
My apologies for missing the last two calls, and I just reviewed the MP3s.
In short, the team's discussion around comments #23 & #32 in my absence are
found to be acceptable.
To elaborate for the record.....
Comment #23 - is only a summary statement to the larger position filed.
Filing this comment as "Noted" is acceptable.
Comment #32 - this list was extracted from earlier efforts in attempts to
document the current state of the Post Expiration process and principles to
be explored. Public comments and survey results have adequately addressed a
number of the bullets. Filing this comment as "Noted" is acceptable and the
responses in the latest version of the public comment tool are fine.
Infinity Portals LLC
From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:10 AM
Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Agenda of today's meeting
3. Review of User Survey
Please have Spreadsheet available locally - will not fit on Adobe
Distributed earlier today and also at
(wiki upload not working)
4. Revisit items from Public Comments:
17: ALAC - Reply to need for predictability
23: CBUC - Consensus policy needed for openness, transparency and
25: Jothan Frakes - Reduce inconsistency
26: Blacknight - Registrants should do housekeeping
32: CBUC - Various issues to be explored