Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] For review - proposed presentation

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Although I didn't like the wording, the report 
regularly uses the expression "most registrars" 
to mean the registrars serving most of the 
registrants. We could use the same thing here.
How about

The WG believes that our recommendations:

- will provide additional guarantees to registrants;
- will improve registrant education and comprehension;
- are in line with current registrar practices 
and will have minimal impact on most registrars.
Alan


At 08/03/2011 01:33 PM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
> Alan ? I am just trying to prepare ourselves for 
> the reaction from the community and decide 
> whether or not a summary works. As we know many 
> people will just read the summary and then we 
> will have reactions like the one I mentioned 
> below. My comment has nothing to do with my 
> satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the report
> From: Alan Greenberg 
> <<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:04:56 -0800
> To: Jeffrey Eckhaus <<mailto:eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marika Konings 
> <<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, 
> PEDNR <<mailto:gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] For review - proposed presentation
>
> Yes, "largest".
>
> I am sure we do care about the impact on the 
> smaller registrars. Just as some of us care that 
> we aren't providing a guaranteed 30 days. I 
> didn't think that this presentation is the right 
> place to be airing our dissatisfaction with 
> parts of the outcome, but rather to be highlighting what we did accomplish.
> Alan
>
> At 08/03/2011 09:53 AM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
> > Alan,
> > I assume you meant largest registrars below and 
> > it is a typo. If that is the case why do we not 
> > care about the impact to smaller registrars, 
> > where these changes will most likely have the adverse impact?
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:27 AM, "Alan Greenberg" 
> > <<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > Thinking about it more, I think we need a 
> > > summary prior to the recommendations giving 
> > > the overall direction of the recs. Without 
> > > trying to word-smith it, something like:
> > > The WG's overall intent was to:
> > >
> > > - provide additional guarantees to registrants
> > > - improve registrant education and comprehension
> > > - have minimal impact of the current business 
> > > practices of the larges registrars serving the majority of registrants
> > > How does this sound?
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > At 07/03/2011 10:07 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > > > Thanks Marika,
> > > >
> > > > Overall it looks great. I do think, however, 
> > > > that we need to be prepared to give a more in 
> > > > depth presentation on at least some of the 
> > > > recommendations. There will not be time to 
> > > > present these formally during the GNSO 
> > > > meeting, but we may well get some questions 
> > > > where a further slide could help. And during 
> > > > the public session, I think it almost 
> > > > mandatory that we go into some more detail.
> > > > If there is general approval for this, I 
> > > > would be happy to pull together some further 
> > > > slides and share them with the WG prior to the weekend.
> > > > With regard to the presentations, and 
> > > > particularly the public one, I think it 
> > > > important that we share the job of presenting 
> > > > the recommendations. So I would like some volunteers...
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > > > At 07/03/2011 03:29 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
> > > > > Dear All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please find attached for your review the 
> > > > > proposed presentation for the different 
> > > > > PEDNR meetings in San Francisco. As a 
> > > > > reminder, the following meetings are currently scheduled:
> > > > >    * Saturday 12 March from 9.30 ? 10.00 
> > > > > (local time) ? Update to the GNSO Council (l (Tower Salon A)
> > > > >    * Monday 14 March from 16.30 ? 118.00 
> > > > > (local time) - Presentation & Discussion of 
> > > > > Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Draft Final Report (Tower Salon A)
> > > > > Feel free to share your comments on the 
> > > > > mailing list and/or tomorrow's PEDNR WG meeting.
> > > > > With best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Marika
> >
> > ----------
> > Please NOTE: This electronic message, including 
> > any attachments, may include privileged, 
> > confidential and/or inside information owned by 
> > Demand Media, Inc. Any distribution or use of 
> > this communication by anyone other than the 
> > intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited 
> > and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
> > intended recipient, please notify the sender by 
> > replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
>
> ----------
> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including 
> any attachments, may include privileged, 
> confidential and/or inside information owned by 
> Demand Media, Inc. Any distribution or use of 
> this communication by anyone other than the 
> intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and 
> may be unlawful. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender by replying 
> to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.