Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Revised PowerPoint presentation
- To: <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Revised PowerPoint presentation
- From: "Mason Cole" <masonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:55:34 -0700
I'm representing the RrSG in the GAC session so probably won't make it there.
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>; PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon Mar 14 11:30:01 2011
Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Revised PowerPoint presentation
There is another meeting in 'our' room just prior to our session, so we
might need to meet in the hallway just outside of the room.
On 14/03/11 18:31, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Based on the two presentation I have done so far, and to facilitate
>our presentation today (assuming we have any attendees).
>- re-order the recommendations into three groups which are (I hope)
>more cohesive and logical) and more easily allow for multiple presenters
>Rec slide 1
> - 1 RNHaE definition
> - 2 8 day renewal guarantee
> - 13 notification of expiration on intercepted web pages
> - 3 Whois changes don't alter ability to renew
>Rec slide 2
> - 6 Disclose post-expiration renewal fees
> - 9 Disclose notification methods
> - 10, 12 Specify 2 pre- and 1 post-expiration notification
> - 11 Notifications via push technology
>Rec slide 3
> - 4, 5 RGP
> - 8 ICANN to develop registrant educational materials
> - 7 Registrars to link to ICANN registrant educational materials
> - 14 Best practice regarding post-expiration e-mail addresses
>Move the note about changes still to come to a 4th slide.
>I suggest that I start the overall presentation, then go to three
>other group members to present the three recommendation slides, and I
>will wrap up and open for questions.
>Can we meet in the room 10 minutes before the presentation to decide
>who does which slide?
> - 8