<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-pednr-dt] Proposed replacement for Recommendations 7 and 8
- To: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Proposed replacement for Recommendations 7 and 8
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:35:10 -0400
The current Recommendations 7 and 8 co-mingle the issues of how the
new educational material is to be created and how it is to be used.
I have drafted revised Recommendations 7 and 8 to separate the two
aspects as well as incorporate the changes that we have agreed to
address the comments received. I have not yet re-drafted the rational sections.
Recommendation 7
ICANN, in consultation with Registrars, ALAC and other interested
parties, will develop educational materials about how to properly
steward a domain name and how to prevent unintended loss. Such
material may include registrant responsibilities and the gTLD domain
life-cycle and instructions for keeping domain name records current.
Recommendation 8
In the event that ICANN gives reasonable notice to Registrars that
ICANN has published web content as described in Recommendation 7:
- Registrars, who have a web presence, must provide a link to the
ICANN content on any website it may operate for domain name
registration or renewal clearly displayed to its Registered Name
Holders at least as clearly as its links to policies or notifications
required to be displayed under ICANN Consensus Policies.
- Registrars may also host similar material adapted to their specific
practices and processes.
- Registrar must point to the ICANN material in a communication sent
to the registrant immediately following initial registration as well
as in the mandated annual WHOIS reminder.
For your convenience, here is the original text as well as excerpts
from the comments.
Recommendation #7: In the event that ICANN gives reasonable notice to
Registrar that ICANN has published web content providing educational
materials with respect to registrant responsibilities and the gTLD
domain life-cycle, and such content is developed in consultation with
Registrars, Registrars, who have a web presence, shall provide a link
to the webpage on any website it may operate for domain name
registration or renewal clearly displayed to its Registered Name
Holders at least as clearly as its links to policies or notifications
required to be displayed under ICANN Consensus Policies.
Rationale: Insufficient registrant understanding and education was
identified as a significant problem and any attempt to address it
will lower the number of problems experienced by registrants.
Recommendation #8: ICANN, with the support of Registrars, ALAC and
other interested parties, is to develop educational materials about
how to properly steward a domain name and how to prevent unintended
loss. Once developed, Registrars are expected to link to or host that
information on its web site, and send to the registrant in a
communication immediately following initial registration as well as
in the mandated annual WHOIS reminder. Such information should
include a set of instructions for keeping domain name records current
and for lessening the chance of mistakenly allowing the name to expire.
[Need to refine wording: expression "include a set of instruction" to
include pointing to appropriate location where instructions can be
found; pointing to ICANN registrant education site.]
Rationale: Insufficient registrant understanding and education was
identified as a significant problem and any attempt to address it
will lower the number of problems experienced by registrants.
Comments:
The WG agrees with the intent of the recommendation, but would
instead encourage registrars to adapt the materials to fit with their
own practices and policies, in addition to linking to ICANN developed content.
Support for this recommendation, but proposal that the recommendation
should be revised by deleting the wording "are expected to" and
inserting the term "must" instead.
In order to clarify the recommendation and address the comment, the
WG agreed to take out 'or host' from the recommendation.
The WG agreed to update the recommendation to change 'with the
support of' to 'in consultation with'.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|