[gnso-pednr-dt] IPC comment for PEDNR

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

The IPC submitted a very substantive comment regarding the PEDNR 
report - see 
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/pednr-board-recommendations-15aug11-en.htm.
I felt that some of their comments needed to be addressed, as they 
could be inferred as saying that the WG was less than meticulous in 
reviewing the comments we received to the draft report.
I have taken the liberty of replying. This was done purely on my only 
behalf and I made that clear. Nevertheless, I think (hope?) that the 
comments do reflect the views of the WG when it reviewed the original 
IPC comments. A copy of my posting is attached.
As Marika has not yet summarized the comments, I am hoping that my 
new post will be reflected in that summary. This is in line with the 
future plans to have a "reply" cycle in future comment periods.
If anyone feels that I have mis-represented the WG, please let me and 
Marika know ASAP and I will do what I can to fix it.
Alan

Attachment: Reply to IPC.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF Document