ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for review

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for review
  • From: Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:23:44 -0400

Chuck:

What about if we change the suggested item #3 as follows:

Whether current *GNSO processes are* adequate to represent all stakeholders
interests in the implementation of policy

-ed


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  I do not support adding the topic of GNSO structure for several reasons:*
> ***
>
> **1.       **It will be part of the GNSO Review process, which will be a
> major undertaking.****
>
> **2.       **It will be a very controversial topic and hence will consume
> large amounts of time and resources and would likely detract from the main
> mission of the WG.****
>
> **3.       **The topic of policy & implementation is not dependent on
> GNSO structure.****
>
> ** **
>
> Chuck****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> *Sent:* Friday, June 21, 2013 10:33 AM
> *To:* 'Marika Konings'; gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft
> charter for review****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,Marika.  Per my previous e-mail, I would amend Task 7. to state
> that the WG will review not only the ICANN By-Laws but also the GNSO
> structure in terms of multistakeholder participation.  So I would suggest
> as follows:****
>
>  ****
>
> 7.     Review the ICANN Bylaws and GNSO voting structure with a
> particular focus on the GNSO 
> PDP<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>and associated GNSO
> PDP Manual<http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-13jun13-en.pdf>,
> to determine: ****
>
> a.      What elements of the process provide guidance regarding
> implementation of policies****
>
> b.      Whether there are any gaps in the Bylaws or process that leave
> ambiguity regarding implementation****
>
> c.  Whether the current structure of the GNSO is adequate to represent all
> stakeholders interests in the implementation of policy****
>
>  ****
>
> Thank you, Anne****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> *****Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> Of Counsel
> Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
> One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxx • 
> www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
> * ****
>
> *P **Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*****
>
> *This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
> intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
> agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
> was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the
> original message.*
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Friday, June 21, 2013 12:27 AM
> *To:* gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-dt] Proposed agenda and updated draft charter
> for review****
>
> Dear All,****
>
> ** **
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Policy & Implementation
> Drafting Team meeting which is scheduled for *Monday 24 June at 19.00 UTC*.
> You'll find attached an updated version of the draft charter, based on the
> modified version that Chuck circulated earlier this week. This version
> incorporates some of the edits suggested on the mailing list to which no
> objections appear to have been made to date:****
>
>    - Proposed additions to mission & scope suggested by Holly in modified
>    form as circulated to the list****
>    - Change "/" to "and" in mission item 1****
>    - Added reference to the existing GNSO Operating Procedures to mission
>    item 1 as suggested by Anne****
>
>  In addition, I addressed some none substantive comments from Chuck such
> as including links and fixed some formatting issues. Please use this
> version for any further comments / edits you may have.****
>
> ** **
>
> With best regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Marika****
>
> ** **
>
> *Proposed Agenda – Policy & Implementation Drafting Team Meeting – Monday
> 24 June at 19.00 UTC*****
>
>    1. Roll Call / SOI****
>    2. Review latest draft of the Charter, including comments received****
>    3. Discuss next steps / confirm next meeting****
>
>  ** **
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>  ------------------------------
>
> For more information about *Lewis and Roca LLP*, please go to *
> www.lewisandroca.com* <http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.****
>
> Phoenix (602)262-5311****
>
>     ****
>
> Reno (775)823-2900****
>
> Tucson (520)622-2090****
>
>     ****
>
> Albuquerque (505)764-5400****
>
> Las Vegas (702)949-8200****
>
>     ****
>
> Silicon Valley (650)391-1380****
>
>   This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
> to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. **
> **
>
>   In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you
> that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not
> intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for
> the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.****
>



-- 
*NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.

GIF image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy