<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for review
- To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for review
- From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:20:29 +0000
Chuck,
I do agree with your observations about time and resources, but certainly do
not agree with the third observation. In fact I think the GNSO structure will
be a huge obstacle to implementing improvements in the way the ICANN Board
reacts to GNSO policy recommendations in the implementation phase and would
certainly make it extremely difficult to amend the ByLaws per Jeff's request.
We can bury this now but it will absolutely come up in the Working Group,
especially given the number of folks who have no vote on the GNSO Council.
Anne
[cid:682381617@21062013-0B9B]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> •
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original
message.
________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 7:46 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Marika Konings'; gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for review
I do not support adding the topic of GNSO structure for several reasons:
1. It will be part of the GNSO Review process, which will be a major
undertaking.
2. It will be a very controversial topic and hence will consume large
amounts of time and resources and would likely detract from the main mission of
the WG.
3. The topic of policy & implementation is not dependent on GNSO
structure.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:33 AM
To: 'Marika Konings'; gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for
review
Thanks,Marika. Per my previous e-mail, I would amend Task 7. to state that the
WG will review not only the ICANN By-Laws but also the GNSO structure in terms
of multistakeholder participation. So I would suggest as follows:
7. Review the ICANN Bylaws and GNSO voting structure with a particular
focus on the GNSO PDP<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>
and associated GNSO PDP
Manual<http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-13jun13-en.pdf>, to
determine:
a. What elements of the process provide guidance regarding implementation
of policies
b. Whether there are any gaps in the Bylaws or process that leave
ambiguity regarding implementation
c. Whether the current structure of the GNSO is adequate to represent all
stakeholders interests in the implementation of policy
Thank you, Anne
[cid:682381617@21062013-0BA2]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> •
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original
message.
________________________________
From:
owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 12:27 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for
review
Dear All,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Policy & Implementation
Drafting Team meeting which is scheduled for Monday 24 June at 19.00 UTC.
You'll find attached an updated version of the draft charter, based on the
modified version that Chuck circulated earlier this week. This version
incorporates some of the edits suggested on the mailing list to which no
objections appear to have been made to date:
* Proposed additions to mission & scope suggested by Holly in modified form
as circulated to the list
* Change "/" to "and" in mission item 1
* Added reference to the existing GNSO Operating Procedures to mission item
1 as suggested by Anne
In addition, I addressed some none substantive comments from Chuck such as
including links and fixed some formatting issues. Please use this version for
any further comments / edits you may have.
With best regards,
Marika
Proposed Agenda – Policy & Implementation Drafting Team Meeting – Monday 24
June at 19.00 UTC
1. Roll Call / SOI
2. Review latest draft of the Charter, including comments received
3. Discuss next steps / confirm next meeting
________________________________
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311
Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090
Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200
Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
________________________________
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|