[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For your review - revised PI Working Definitions

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

These look pretty good to me.  Am I the only one who prefers tables to be 
formatted so that rows do not break across pages?

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:27 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - revised PI Working Definitions

Dear All,

On behalf of the definitions sub-team, please find attached an updated version 
of the proposed working definitions in which the sub-team has aimed to address 
the comments and feedback provided by the Working Group during the last meeting.

As you review this document, please take into account that these working 
definitions have been developed for the limited use by the PI Working group as 
a starting point to facilitate the discussions and deliberations outlined in 
the WG's charter. These definitions are expected to evolve during and as a 
result of the WG deliberations. At the end of the process, the WG is expected 
to review these definitions, add/update as deemed appropriate and include them 
in the Final Report.

Should you have any comments, proposed edits and/or questions, you are strongly 
encouraged to share these in advance of the next meeting (Wednesday 19 
February) with the mailing list.

Best regards,

Marika