[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Attendance and Recording Policy and Implementation WG meeting - 10 December 2014
Dear All, The next Policy and Implementation Working Group teleconference is scheduled next week on Wednesday 17 December at 20:00 UTC for 1 hour. Please find the MP3 recording for the Policy and Implementation Working group call held on Wednesday 10 December 2014 at 20:00 UTC at: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-policy-implementation-20141210-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-policy-implementation-20141210-en.mp3 On page: <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#dec> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#dec The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Cheryl Langdon-Orr - At-Large Amr Elsadr - NCUC Chuck Gomes - RySG Greg Shatan - IPC Alan Greenberg-ALAC Stephanie Perrin - NCUC Klaus Stoll- NPOC Michael Graham - IPC Tom Barrett - RrSG Apologies: Avri Doria - NCSG Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC Olevie Kouami - NPOC J.Scott Evans - BC ICANN staff: Marika Konings Amy Bivins Karen Lentz Steve Chan Berry Cobb Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: <https://community.icann.org/x/y1V-Ag> https://community.icann.org/x/y1V-Ag Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat Transcript for Wednesday 10 December 2014 Marika Konings:Welcome to the Policy & Implementation Working Group Meeting of 10 December 2014 Greg Shatan:I am here and on the phone. Alan Greenberg:Don't understand why Marika is worried about this. It is not like she is involved with any other ongoing important projects! Stephanie Perrin:I agree....more useful to get a penultimate draft out to engender discussion as this stuff is sometimes a bit difficult to understand. Marika Konings:@Alan: :-P Terri Agnew:Amr Elsadr has joined Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Absolutly agree @Chuck Terri Agnew:Michael Graham has joined Marika Konings:Michael, can you let us know when you are on audio? Marika Konings:Chuck is having connectivity problems and would like to turn the meeting over to you. Terri Agnew:Welcome Tom Barrett Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Thanks Marika that would be helpful Cheryl Langdon-Orr:agree @Stephanie Cheryl Langdon-Orr:YES! Marika Konings:Fully agree with Amr - a request may be made to several groups at the same time. It would be up to those groups to identify whether they have further questions and want a liaison. Marika Konings:You cannot require any other SO/AC to provide a liaison, you can nicely ask them to do so ;-) Amr Elsadr:We don't want to scare folks off by making them think we have all these rules built around how they can ask us questions!! :) Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Point of Contact works Cheryl Langdon-Orr:with a "Pleae provde to GNSO Coincil a Point of Contact" works Stephanie Perrin:That was certainly my understanding of the term....happy with point of contact if it is less scary. Further, a liaison does not in my book mean the world's best expert....just needs to know the questions. Marika Konings:Noted Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Of course the term 'Liaison' may have specific meaning in some requestors own rules Marika Konings:No, I don't think a liaison 'counts' as a Council member (according to the Bylaws) Alan Greenberg:Definitely not. Liaisons are very explicitly not Members of the Council. Cheryl Langdon-Orr:INDEED! Alan Greenberg:Which does not alter the fact that for much of my 8 years, I was gennerally treated as a (lower case) member... Chuck Gomes:One Councilor objection seems okay to me Amr Elsadr:I would think one objection is enough to trigger a vote. Amr Elsadr:But wouldn't mind sending a question about it out during public comment. Chuck Gomes:@ Alan: You were a very good lower case member! Alan Greenberg:{blush} Chuck Gomes::) Alan Greenberg:Actually Alan Greenberg:{blush} Stephanie Perrin:Does propose have a defined meaning? Amr Elsadr:Wouldn't a council motion to approve a submitted GIP request be necessary? Amr Elsadr:On the consent agenda? Marika Konings:No - the idea would be that it could be started without a formal vote or motion (think for example about the public comment that has been prepared on the nominating commitee report) Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Agree @Chuck all 3 processes Amr Elsadr:@Marika: OK. similar to a preliminary issues report? I think that sounds good. Marika Konings:Preliminary Issue Report does require a motion and vote Amr Elsadr:Yeah. I figured that was the comparable context here as well. I think that works. Cheryl Langdon-Orr:I have anither cauys will stay here in aC onlyll coming in now g Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Here ONKY in AC now no audio from me... Got another AC Meeting started Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Sorry Amr Elsadr:To what extent is it necessary to seek input from other SOs/ACs for a GIP? Alan Greenberg:I am presenting at another meeting in a few minutes and need to leave now. Sorry. Cheryl Langdon-Orr:We are ready to start soon@Alan Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Bye Thanks Michael / Chic Thanks all Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Chic = ChUck Amr Elsadr:Bye. Cheryl Langdon-Orr:bye Attachment:
smime.p7s |