<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For final review - Policy & Implementation Working Group Final Report
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For final review - Policy & Implementation Working Group Final Report
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:24:12 +0000
Thank you very much Marika. My feedback is provided below. I think all of my
suggestions are minor editorial changes.
Section 1.2
The link to the review tool is dated 29 April. Shouldn't this be linked to a
later version of the review tool? We didn't finish reviewing comments until
well into May.
Annex D - Proposed GNSO Guidance Process Manual
I think it would be helpful if footnote 31 in Section 9 of the Manual was
modified as follows: "Approval of GGP recommendations requires a GNSO
Supermajority vote as defined in the GNSO Operating procedures and/or ICANN
Bylaws." If this is done here, it should be done in other cases where a GNSO
Supermajority vote is referenced.
Annex E - Proposed GNSO Guidance Process Bylaw Provision
The first paragraph of Section 3 includes two references to the Bylaws by
simply stating the Articles. Should we proceed each reference with 'Bylaws' to
make it clear or is it sufficiently clear without doing that. If we make those
changes here, we should do it in other places in the report where this occurs,
if any. I am comfortable leaving this to staff's discretion.
ANNEX L - Implementation Review Team Principles & Guidelines
The following edits are needed in V.G: "IRT deliberations should not be used as
a tool to reopen a previously explored policy issue only because a constituency
or stakeholder group was not satisfied with the outcome of a previously held
process on the same policy issue, unless the circumstances have changed and/or
new information is available."
ANNEX L - WG Membership and Participation
* I think this should be ANNEX M.
* I think we should delete the names of those who did not attend any
meetings but if others think they should remain I am okay with that.
* Am I correct in assuming that the # of meetings attended will be
inserted after we have the final tally?
It looks to me that all of the edits proposed over the last few weeks were
appropriately made.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 4:31 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For final review - Policy & Implementation
Working Group Final Report
Dear All,
As discussed during yesterday's meeting, please find attached the revised draft
of the Policy & Implementation Final Report for your review. To faciliate your
review, I've included both a clean and redline version. If there are any
remaining issues that need to be discussed by the WG, please flag those by
Tuesday 26 May at 14.00 UTC at the latest. Based on the feedback received, the
chairs will decide whether a call is needed on Wednesday 27 May, or whether the
WG can proceed to a consensus call which will be carried out via email.
Thanks,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|