[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I certainly support.  Excellent work everyone and special kudos to Chuck and 
Marika and Mary!  Looking forward to the discussion at Council…
Anne

[cid:image001.gif@01D0986E.D2B4C070]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>








From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:46 PM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation 
WG Recommendations
Importance: High

As co-chairs of the Policy & Implementation WG, J. Scott and I have reached the 
following conclusions:

1.       All of the public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG 
and amendments made to the Initial Report as agreed to by the WG.

2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on the 
WG list since Marika sent the latest redline version of the Final Report to the 
WG list on 21 May with a response deadline of Tuesday 26 May at 14.00 UTC.

3.       There is full consensus of the WG on the Final Report as attached in 
clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all 
edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in March 
2015 (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en 
).

All WG participants have until 23:59 UTC on Friday, 29 May, 2015 to object to 
the ‘full consensus’ call by the co-chairs.  If anyone objects, please explain 
your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted time, the report will be sent 
by our Council Liaison Amr to the GNSO Council for their action along with a 
draft motion for its approval.

If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.

Thanks to everyone for helping us get to this point.

Chuck Gomes


“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that 
is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender 
immediately and delete this message immediately.”

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.